resources. It also freduces farmers’ dependence on external
inputs. For these reasons, agroecology works especially well
for small and medium-sized family farms.
With agroecology, the productivity of family farmers
often increases. As well as high productivity levels, agro-
ecological systems provide other benefits, which act as a
counterweight to many of the factors responsible for the
crisis in conventional farming. They have a positive energy
balance and low fossil fuel energy use. They are economic
in their use of water. They recuperate and conserve soil
fertility without the use of external inputs, and are resistant
to soil erosion. They function as carbon sinks and emit very
A science, a movement and a practice
Agroecology is a science, a movement and a practice, and is
strongest where these three aspects converge.
• Practice and knowledge building lies at the heart of agroecology.
It is developed and spread through farmer learning and
experimentation, which can be supported by local organizations,
researchers, governments and civil society.
• As a movement, agroecology seeks to create a social,
institutional and policy environment where agroecological
initiatives can flourish and spread by, for example, supporting
the establishment of peasant-to-peasant learning initiatives,
supporting and initiating political campaigns to advocate policies
that recognize indigenous seeds or by mobilizing farmers and
citizens to strengthen regional food systems.
• As a science, agroecology seeks to gain an understanding of the
social and ecological dynamics of food and farming systems and
their relevance for sustainability.
In agroecology, the experiences, knowledge, values and aspirations
of family farmers are central.
[
] 44
Image: Alexia Skok
Agroecology can help family farmers to contribute to food security for themselves and their communities
little in terms of greenhouse gases. They are functionally
integrated with the natural vegetation, providing greater
stability to local microclimates. And they do not generate
chemical or genetic contamination.
Taken as a whole, these positive effects indicate that
promoting agroecology is a strategy that can provide not
only benefits for family farmers themselves, but also a
comprehensive structural response to the crises in the world.
It meets the challenge of feeding an expanding world popu-
lation while respecting sustainability and biodiversity, and
providing climate-resilient solutions. This potential has been
recognized by the International Assessment of Agricultural
Science and Technology for Development, a three-year initi-
ative financed by organizations linked to the United Nations
and involving the efforts of a multidisciplinary group of 400
scientists from every continent in the world. The outgoing
United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Human Right
to Food Olivier de Schutter, has also repeatedly stated
that agroecology can simultaneously increase agricultural
productivity and food security, build climate resilience and
improve the incomes of family farmers.
The main challenge to achieving a wider spread of agro-
ecology is not technical but political. It involves the need
to overcome the political, economic and ideological power
of agribusiness and governments that drives the contin-
ued expansion of the industrial farming model. Among the
many well-documented negative effects of this approach,
it has been the main factor behind the disappearance of
small-scale family farmers worldwide. This disappearance
not only means more rural poverty, it also implies the loss
of traditional culture and knowledge of rural peoples and
communities – essential elements in the construction of
sustainable, agroecological farming systems.
D
eep
R
oots