Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  24 / 26 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 26 Next Page
Page Background

A

s the golf industry slowly begins

to rebound, it is important to

recognize the bubble growth

of the past few decades has harmed

the segment of golf that should be

the primary avenue to growth for

the game. That segment is the small

country golf course, whether private

or public, that serves those who

enjoy the game for its simple virtues

of overcoming obstacles, enjoying

the company of family and friends, a

commune with nature that settles the

soul, provides a semblance of exercise,

and provides that high when a golf

ball is struck purely.

That golf course model has been

closing at a rapid pace as more

expensive golf courses that failed to

hit the mark their feasibility studies

targeted in fatter times have reduced

their fees. Now those ‘country club

for a day’ facilities are in direct

competition with the more established

icons of the community that serve the

everyday golfer.

These country courses consider

upgrades on a shoestring budget,

often with the last bit of capital

available in a last-ditch effort toward

survival. Time and again, the decision

to go ‘in-house’ leads to the inevitable

short-cuts that result in more money

spent on fixing the short cut than if

done correctly in the first place.

The first cost-cutting decision in the

process is often to eliminate the golf

course architect (and his/her fees).

Inevitably that is always the move that

hurts the most. Most golf architects,

though, are worth far more to the

bottom line than their fees. This value

comes not only in controlling costs, but

also in creating more value per dollar.

A club seeking to cut costs without

bringing in a professional clearly has

corner-cutting in mind. This usually

comes as a result of not knowing the

myriad ways to accomplish specific

tasks. An architect may introduce an

alternative approach that may cost more,

but it usually involves proper execution

and materials resulting in better quality,

or more value through an approach

that may indeed cost a bit more in

implementation. In other words, getting

more bang for one’s buck.

Yes, if you hire a golf architect, the

cost of the project may exceed one’s

initial budget. The reason is that

one of the golf architect’s primary

goals is to ensure clients perform

tasks the proper way, rather than the

cost-cutting way. So, yes, it is more

expensive to utilize a golf architect

than not… on the surface. Yet, most

likely, that initial budget never

included realistic quantities or costs

because, frankly, it just costs more to

do it the right way.

Once the decision to cut the architect

is made and a project is underway,

that unrealistic budget is strictly

adhered to by cutting quantities

and scope instead of assessing the

overall approach. More corners are

cut, resulting in a project that didn’t

achieve its initial purpose, yet sapped

the club of its only remaining capital.

Most likely, additional work will be

required sooner down the road than

later, rendering any cost savings moot

in the process.

Without proper professional

guidance, a club can spend much more

out of the gate by taking 10 seemingly

simple steps rather than five steps that

may require slightly more time and

money. Yet the result is much more

value. That value and time-saving

expertise is what the golf architect can

bring to any size project.

Even with something as innocuous

as replacing bunker sand, a seasoned

expert may find a solution where one

wasn’t even looking. Simply fixing

a bunker edge or reducing a bay for

playability in the process could save

the client extra effort or provide a

much better product at a fraction of

its cost to implement.

The second part of this article, where

Mandell provides more detail on how a

golf course architect brings value to even

the smallest of design decisions for any golf

course, is available at

www.asgca.org .

And visit the Free Publications section

of the ASGCA website to download the

‘Selecting Your Golf Course Architect:

Questions & Answers’ flyer.

Mandell also organizes the Symposium

on Affordable Golf, with this year’s event

taking place in Canton, Ohio on 12-13

October. For more information, visit

www.symposiumonaffordablegolf.com

Affordable Golf

|

Richard Mandell, ASGCA Associate

The first cut

is the deepest

CLOSING THOUGHTS

Richard Mandell, ASGCA Associate

Based in Pinehurst, North Carolina,

golf architect Richard Mandell’s

philosophy is founded on simplicity

in design and inspiration in the land.

24

|

By Design

In the first of a two part article on cost reduction,

Richard Mandell, ASGCA Associate, highlights the

importance of consulting a qualified golf architect