Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  6 / 20 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 20 Next Page
Page Background

6

|

By Design

ROUNDTABLE

at the top. Programs such as this

work when clubs are demanding it,

not when they are being told it is

something they need to do.

Is there not a concern that adopting

the system may be expensive and

disruptive?

Muirhead:

Although the cost of

adding new tees and properly

implementing the system is subject

to a variety of site-specific variables,

including the desired construction

methodology, I think in most cases,

the answer is ‘no’. Many courses,

especially those built during the

past 20 years, already have multiple

teeing grounds that can easily

accommodate the majority of

recommended tee marker locations.

Sometimes, simply extending the

front or rear of an existing tee is all

that’s required. Where additional

forward tees are necessary, they

can often be easily sculpted into

existing fairways and roughs at a

very low cost. Sometimes those

tees can even be added on existing

grades, with no actual ‘construction’

required. Compared to other

course improvements, the cost

and inconvenience associated with

adding tees is minimal, while the

potential benefits and ‘bang for the

buck’ are significant.

Johnston:

Building new tees is one

of the least expensive construction

items on golf courses, but this system

may work on some courses without

any new tees. It all depends on the

topography of the golf course and

the imagination of the person laying

out the tees. The most forward tees

are often a flat part of the fairway

and defined with a plaque mounted

flush with the ground for ease of

maintenance. If new tees are added,

they are generally smaller in scope

and perhaps slightly off to one side

of the golf hole. Every golf course

will be different in terms of where

and how new tee areas are created

or located. An ASGCA member can

layout the tee system, provide a cost

estimate and even get competitive

prices for the work.

Why use an ASGCA member to do

this type of work?

Muirhead:

One of the reasons Dan

Van Horn and his team at the U.S.

Kids Golf Foundation reached

out to the ASGCA Foundation

to partner on this initiative was

because they realized ASGCA

members have the skill set and

experience required to properly

evaluate each site and determine

the most beneficial tee locations,

both in terms of playability and

cost effective construction, to best

adapt and implement the system to

a given property. Achieving that is

paramount to creating the desired

golfer experience and the overall

success of the program and facility.

Our members are also best equipped

to introduce the Longleaf Tee

System and educate decision-makers

regarding its scope and benefits, as

well as helping to develop associated

construction costs and schedules. I

believe the participation of ASGCA

members is critical to the success of

the program.

LaFoy:

ASGCA members are engaged

in the design of golf courses on a

full-time basis and, as professional

designers, they have been fully vetted

by their peers. The ASGCA has gone

to great lengths to explain and educate

our members about the Longleaf

Tee System. We share information

not only about this, but all phases of

golf course design, as we understand

that the more our members know,

the better we can serve the golfing

community. Continuing education is

and always has been a major facet of

the ASGCA.

We asked Greg Muirhead, ASGCA, how the Longleaf Tee Initiative has been

received in discussions with clients.

The response has been very positive. Similar to the experience of our ASGCA

Foundation Board, when we visited Longleaf for a first-hand tour and program

presentation by ASGCA member Bill Bergin, people are typically surprised

by the simplicity of the system. After a short presentation, it’s easy for most to

understand the considerable research and data that supported the development

of the system and appreciate the potential benefits.

As with any proposed course improvement, many of the questions relate to

cost. I always emphasize the methods available to manage costs, while still

implementing the program. I also stress the need for each facility to consider

how implementing the program can help increase participation and positively

impact a facility’s bottom line. There’s certainly a return on investment, not only

with revenue from the increased rounds played, but also with increased cart

rentals, food and beverage sales, merchandise sales and lessons.

Positive reception

Photo: Istockphoto/ImagineGolf