

[
] 152
activities are difficult to expand due to land and labour
constraints. About 50 per cent of the participants belong to
this group and they were able to increase their income above
the poverty line. About 30 per cent of the participants have
not been able to increase their monthly income due to lack
of hard work and choosing difficult projects such as rearing
chickens, ducks or fish. The income of participants in this
group is still at the poverty line. In general MARDI has
helped 526 families in various economic project activities
and 325 (61.8 per cent) were able to increase their monthly
income above the poverty line.
The experience of implementing this project has given
MARDI officers some guidance in the implementation of
projects involving the poor and destitute. The enthusiasm
of the participants was one of the most important factors that
determined the success of the project. Selection of project
activities by participants was solely based on the partici-
pants’ capability to implement them and not based on the
economic potential of the business.
The performance of each project activity chosen by
the participants varies in terms of their potential and the
expected level of success. Project activities involving direct
business dealings such as selling food products in kiosks and
food stalls, farm cleaning services and fishing are easier to
implement and maintain. Project activities that are closely
related to the ordinary activities of the village community
such as crop production, food processing and selling of
beverages are equally successful. These projects are catego-
rized as ‘Quick Win’. They can be easily implemented and
continued because no technical skills are required (except
for food processing) and they only require minimum capital
with the provision of basic facilities.
Project activities that are difficult to succeed in and
sustain are those involved with the rearing of livestock
and fisheries, mushroom cultivation and fertigation. The
successes of these activities are difficult to predict due to
factors such as the requirement of technological knowl-
edge to manage them and combat disease attack. The high
cost of inputs such as seeds/breeds, fertilizers and feeds,
uncertain sale prices and the high cost of investment are
also factors that affect the success of the project. From this
experience, it was indicated that in a poverty eradication
programme, Quick Win project activities should be given
priority to ensure success.
A participant selling food products to local tourists
Image: MARDI
D
eep
R
oots