[
] 40
From crisis to consensus: the future
of forestry in Asia and the Pacific
Jack Hurd, Asia-Pacific Forest Program Director, The Nature Conservancy
Allison Bleaney, Communications and Partnership Manager, Responsible Asia Forestry and Trade Program
O
ver the past decade, the crisis brought on by rampant
deforestation and forest degradation has prompted
a fundamental shift in Asia’s forest policy dialogue,
including the desire for a more holistic approach to manage-
ment that integrates social, economic, ecological and climate
goals. However, forests continue to be degraded and converted
to other uses. These activities will persist unless the financial
and political incentives that drive land-management decisions
are rapidly changed to reinforce this new approach.
Thankfully, this change is happening. Growing demand for legal
and sustainable wood products and increased awareness of the link
between forests and climate change are prompting governments and
industry to move away from ‘business as usual’ and seriously pursue
improved forest management. This is positioning the forest sector as
a potential model for the global shift to a green/ low-carbon economy.
Challenges
Rapid economic growth in Asia and changes in manufac-
turing processes, logistics and information technology
have fuelled unsustainable and illegal logging in many
forested countries over the last 20 years. This threatens
the livelihoods and security of indigenous communities
and vulnerable populations, while causing widespread
environmental degradation and releasing substantial
and unnecessary carbon dioxide emissions into the
global atmosphere.
While forest cover has increased in some countries
in the region, this is largely due to the rapid expan-
sion of plantations designed to stabilize soils and feed
into an increasingly dynamic pulp and paper sector.
Natural forest quantity and quality, however, contin-
ues to decline in many countries. There are a number of
reasons for this, but the underlying causes are complex
and connected:
• Existing financial and political incentives undermine
robust, holistic forest management
• Institutional structures and policy mechanisms are
outdated and ill-suited to current comprehensive
forest management objectives
• Land-use planning does not adequately consider the
interests of all stakeholders
• Limitations in human and institutional capacity
prevent optimal management of forest land and the
interplay between land-use practices.
These factors perpetuate singular interests and lead
to conflict over management objectives that produce
sub-optimal outcomes in both land-use planning and
land-management decision-making. Of the above-
mentioned factors, it is the misalignment of incentives
that drives everything else.
Opportunities
Fortunately, growing interest in green and low-carbon
development is creating incentives and opportunities
for improved forest management.
Demand for legal and sustainable timber products
–
The East Asia Forest Law Enforcement and Governance
conference held in Bali, Indonesia in 2001 ushered in a
new era in which government agencies, private corpo-
rations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and
other institutions committed to combat illegal logging
Measuring forest carbon, East Kalimantan, Indonesia
Image: ©Bridget Besaw