Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  200 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 200 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 200

W

ater

C

ooperation

, S

ustainability

and

P

overty

E

radication

the Okavango – as different eco-environments need

different approaches to wastewater treatment – and

recommended that requirements for managing liquid

waste should become stricter from dry land to wetland.

In open fresh water and perennial swamps, there should

be no discharge of liquid waste at all.

The guidelines also took account of the enormous

variation in the amounts of liquid waste produced and

treated, ranging from large volumes by council waste-

water treatment plants, schools, hospitals, commerce

and hotels, to small volumes by lodges and camps, camp

sites, mobile operators, rural communities and private

homes. The different set ups vary in the volume of waste

they generate and each requires different guidelines.

The guidelines considered site conditions, expected

wastewater generation rates, desirable effluent quality,

construction costs and maintenance requirements –

everything from selecting sites for treatment plants

to developing, operating and decommissioning them.

Sophisticated liquid waste treatment facilities would

need to be serviced and maintained by skilled staff and

would create difficulties in small isolated communities.

In these cases, low-maintenance septic tank soak-away

systems could be more reliable. Powered sludge systems

would not be suitable for off-grid areas or where solar

electricity would be too costly to install.

As well as the need to manage liquid waste, there

is a need to manage the storage and movement of

Open and inclusive discussions arranged by GWP Botswana as

part of the two projects allowed these different parties to voice their

concerns and explore ways of keeping the risk of pollution to a

minimum. Representatives of the tourist industry, for example,

explained that their difficulties in dealing with liquid waste lay in

operating in remote areas, the plethora of different institutions they

had to deal with and unfamiliarity with some of the technical issues

in treating liquid waste.

The outcome of the discussions was agreement that it would

be useful to produce a set of guidelines for managing liquid waste

in the Okavango Delta Ramsar Site. Following up on this, the

Integrated Water Resource Management-Water Efficiency Project,

GWP Botswana and Biokavango Project approached the North West

District Council, Department of Water Affairs and the Department

of Waste Management and Pollution Control with a proposal to

develop such a set of guidelines. The guidelines would be a step

towards safeguarding water quality and the environment by mini-

mizing contamination from inadequately treated sewage and other

liquid waste.

A Botswana consultancy Ecosurv was tasked with developing the

guidelines. In drawing up the guidelines, the consultants ensured

they conformed to national standards and international obligations.

The Okavango Delta Management Plan Waste Management Strategy

and a 2008 Biokavango Project Report assessing liquid waste

systems in tourism establishments and transport, and handling and

storage of hazardous substances in the Okavango Delta, provided

a solid foundation for Ecosurv to develop recommendations for

the guidelines. The guidelines considered the main ecotypes in

The Okavango Delta Ramsar Site in Botswana is being protected from the risk of pollution

Image: Claudia Uribe/Photodisc/Getty Images