Previous Page  24 / 192 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 192 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 24

saw the connection to access to basic education largely

as an issue in developing countries but also recognized

the need to address ‘quality’ from the perspective of

the large numbers of under-educated people in the

developed world. Slowly the first thrust expanded from

simple access to retention to address the high dropout

rates in all countries.

The idea of access to quality education led to discus-

sions regarding the very purpose of education and the

emergence of the Delors Report titled ‘Learning: the

treasure within’. Eventually the discussions around EFA

enlarged to ask

What education for all?

In the north,

the questions around the first thrust regarding quality

education finally led to the engagement of formal educa-

tion, as these were legitimate questions that ministries

had to answer and for which they could be formally

held responsible. Ministry officials could comprehend

quality whereas they did not understand ESD as yet.

The first attempt to carry out the UN CSD’s request

to develop guidelines for reorienting the world’s teacher

education systems occurred as a side meeting at the

twentieth anniversary of Tbilisi in Thessaloniki, Greece

in 1997. This resulted in the formation of the first

UNESCO Chair in ESD. The Chair was tasked with the

development of these guidelines and it was within this

process, which engaged teacher education institutions

(TEI) from over 25 countries worldwide, that serious

inroads were made to engage the formal disciplines

ESD as their issue. Also the prospect of comprehensively reorient-

ing existing education systems that were largely being hampered by

budgetary restrictions from the recession of the early 1990s proved

a major deterrent for ministries, both in the developed and develop-

ing worlds.

The formal education sector was slow to react and in the early

days of the 1990s, it was the energy and help of the adjectival

educations that largely nurtured and developed ESD. It was EE,

development education, citizenship education, global educa-

tion, peace education and a host of other ‘adjectivals’ oriented to

social issues that kept ESD growing and maturing. This assistance

continues today with the emergence of green economics, ecological

economics and climate change education etc.

Despite the hesitation of the formal education systems, the

need for ESD grew. By 1996, the UN Commission on Sustainable

Development (UN CSD) identified ESD as one of the four main

priorities for the UN system’s sustainability programme and called

for action in this regard throughout the UN system. The Commission

specifically requested UNESCO to develop guidelines for the reori-

enting of teacher education to address sustainability.

Slowly, ESD developed in the academic world. The late 1990s

saw academic journals publishing ESD research and opinion pieces.

UNESCO did its best to maintain the support of the crucial adjec-

tival educations but also to slowly raise the profile of ESD within

formal education. By 1996 the four main thrusts of ESD (i.e. access

to basic education, reorienting existing education from that which

focused solely on development, public awareness raising and train-

ing) were becoming better understood. Many ministries of education

Mid-Decade Assembly at Bonn

Image: Lyle Benko