

[
] 11
R
egional
P
erspectives
lation and relatively scarce agricultural resources. Family
farming has been an essential part of the folk custom and
rural culture of Asian societies since it first appeared. This
cultural aspect of family farming explains why research
on Asian rural societies (for example, Japan and China)
pays so much attention to ‘family’. Family farming is seen
as the comprehensive outcome of land legacy, ancestral
rules, household rights to common agricultural resources
and strong social bonds interwoven by individual families.
Peasant agriculture and family farming has supported the
orderly operation of traditional agrarian society due to its
incomparable advantages in production organization and
social stabilization. Many Asian countries formally insti-
tutionalize the family as the fundamental farming unit
through land reform and legislation.
The dominant role of family farming in Asian agriculture
is a constant feature across time and space in this region.
From the past to the present, the basic and primary opera-
tive unit of agriculture in Asian societies has always been
the family. During the post-war development period in the
region, debates on the relationship between small family
farms and large-scale, commercial farms persisted and were
often focused on economic aspects. Academic proponents
of family farming usually tried to explain its persistence
through the economics of its organizing process and the
unique features of agriculture. Far from being substi-
tuted by large-scale commercial farms as both neoclassical
economics and Marxist theories assumed, family farming
adapts well and thrives in modern times through its diverse
modalities in different societies. As the most important way
to realize the multifunctionality of agriculture, the vitality
and significance of family farming in Asia and the Pacific
particularly centres on the maintenance of livelihood, agro-
ecological protection and rural-urban development. Hunger
and malnutrition predominate in Asia, especially among
family farmers. According to the World Bank (2004), small
family farmers in South and East Asia and sub-Saharan
Africa represent over 92 per cent of the world’s dollar-
poor. However, family farming as such does not necessarily
induce poverty. With positive public investment and policy
support, family farming is able to provide a decent income
for rural people. In Japan, for instance, the average income
per farming household in 2012 was about US$58,500, of
which a considerable part (31.1 per cent) came from agri-
cultural activities.
The success of family farming lies not in specialization
or profit maximization, but in practising farming to meet
diverse household needs rather than responding to market
opportunities alone. To satisfy the various needs of family
livelihood (such as food, nutrition, clothing and cash
income), small family farms usually adopt a scope economy
rather than the scale economy used in large industrial
farms. Hence, they are more productive than large mono-
cropping farms in terms of resource utilization. Family
farming, as a means of livelihood, cannot be perceived
separately from the pluriactive role of rural households.
However, family farming’s contribution to non-commod-
ified household production is largely underestimated in
national economies.
In terms of biological sustainability, family farmers in
Asia and the Pacific often develop farming systems and
practices to adapt to different local conditions, marginal
land endowments and climatic variability. Diversification
is therefore an important farm strategy for managing
production risk in small farming systems. The biodiversity
feature of family farming and the traditional agroecological
system that many family farms maintain have extraordinary
significance for this region, which has scarce agricultural
resources and is vulnerable to various climatic disas-
ters. In addition, family farmers help build stronger rural
communities since they are more integrated with the local
economy. Small farms not only help reduce unemployment,
but also help in maintaining a vibrant local economy that
can help build stronger rural communities. Rural develop-
ment practices currently emerging in Asian societies are
not promoted through top-down policy interventions, but
largely driven by the grass-roots activities and innovations
of family farmers. In a very explicit sense, a series of new
decentralized markets, or nested markets, is arising in
the countryside as the outcome of the strength of family
farmers’ dynamics and initiatives. The defence of family
farming in Asian societies is beginning to translate into
diversified rural development practices (such as agritour-
ism and new markets), improved nutrition and food safety
for rural and urban people, and above all shared values on
the beauty of agriculture and the countryside.
Family farming in Asia and the Pacific region is highly
diverse, making it difficult to come up with a simple defini-
tion. Spanning from full-time family members farming with
the support of wage labour, as in China, to small-scale and
subsistence farmers as in Pakistan and the Pacific Islands,
family farming can be characterized in a general sense as
family-based and small-scale. Defining family farming
implies an ongoing process of increased understanding of
situations at the local and national levels. Family farming
is a self-evident phenomenon in Asia. However, there is
hardly a clear and comprehensive definition that spans
all the different realities at national or at regional level in
Asia and the Pacific. Similarly, the term ‘family farm’ is not
commonly used in the history of Asian agriculture. Instead,
there are some parallel concepts deeply rooted in different
cultures and languages when referring to this family-based
farming unit. In contrast to Western countries such as in
Europe and North America, the old ‘agrarian question’ has
never been ‘resolved’ in Asian countries as family farming
has not disappeared nor been replaced by commercial farms
and agribusiness. Debates and analysis concerning family
farming and family farms boomed only when ‘family farming’
in Asian countries seemed problematic in encountering
globalized capitalism and West-shaped modernization.
Under the umbrella term ‘family farm’, the form of family-
based agricultural operation as such represents drastic
differentiation along with agrarian change in the region in
general. Japan and China might be taken as examples to
explore the diversity and differentiation of family farming
between and within countries. Both countries have official
classification and scholarly debates regarding family farming.
Yet due to their different positions in terms of economic