

[
] 53
Image: Christo Marais
Large-scale degradation in the catchment of the Mount Fletcher dam
Furthermore, over the last 20 years the Working for…
programmes have succeeded in mainstreaming ecologi-
cal restoration into the employment and rural development
debates. South Africa has a number of socioeconomic chal-
lenges, the toughest of which arguably include unemployment,
safety and security, education, health, rural development and
water and energy security. The natural resource management
programmes contribute primarily to addressing unemploy-
ment, rural development and water security, but have the
potential to make more tangible contributions to primary
health (water quality of run-of-river water extractions in rural
areas), education and energy.
Strong political buy-in and active support for programmes
started with Professor Asmal in 1995 and continues today
under Minister Edna Molewa, with the programmes having
the full support of every minister responsible for water and
environmental affairs since its inception. Political support,
though, cannot be sustained without substance. The magni-
tude of the natural resource management programmes today
is not to be underestimated. Its socioeconomic impacts, the
areas cleared of invasive alien plants, degraded land restored
and fires suppressed are very significant contributions not
only to the economy but also to environmental resilience and
the mitigation of, and adaption to climate change
Since the inception of the WfW programme the family of
natural resource programmes has together created more than
227,100 person years of employment across South Africa. The
programmes grew from just over 6,100 employment opportu-
nities to more than 50,000 on average over the last three years.
During that time, consistently around 50 per cent of these
were female and more than 60 per cent were younger than 35
years old. WoF, a programme where one would expect a very
low percentage of women, has more than 30 per cent women
in its employment, arguably the highest for any fire manage-
ment institution in the world. More than 90 per cent of the
fire fighters are younger than 35.
To date some 2.8 million hectares of invasive alien plants
have been treated. To put this in context, one has to compare
it to the extent of such plants in the country. Invasive alien
plants cover some 20 million hectares of South Africa to a
lesser or greater extent. If compressed to 100 per cent density,
they would cover around 1.9 million hectares, an area bigger
than the Gauteng Province or the Kruger National Park.
Although on the surface it looks as if WfW is making progress,
research has shown that invasive alien plants may be spread-
ing by between 7.4 per cent and 15.6 per cent, necessitating
additional investment.
3
To curb the rate of spread and improve
the sustainability of the labour-intensive clearing programmes
WfW is investing around US$4 million of its annual budget in
biological control.
4
Biocontrol is known to drastically reduce
seed set and in some cases even kill its host species.
WfWet has invested in the restoration of 970 wetlands since its
inception. Despite this being a substantial number, investments
in wetland restoration will have to be increased significantly if the
impact on countrywide water quality and retention for improv-
ing dry season flows is to show a marked improvement.
To date Working for Ecosystems has nearly 22,000 hectares
under restoration for improving watershed services, seques-
tering carbon, improving the productive potential of the land
and improving biodiversity. WoF has fought more than 13,100
fires since its inception. On average it has contributed to the
suppression of around 15 per cent (expressed as a percentage of
estimated area burned) of all veld and forest fires since its incep-
tion, with a high of 27 per cent during the 2014/15 fire seasons.
It is important, though, to put these achievements into context.
Arguably the biggest investment in the restoration of ecological
infrastructure and the delivery of ecosystemservices has been done
through WfW. It is estimated that invasive alien plants reduce
streamflow by around 3 per cent. This might sound small but it
represents 1,443.56millionm
3
of water per year. In the high yield
catchments that are important water sources for economic growth
in the country, the reduction in streamflow exceeds 5 per cent of
Image: Dr. Bennie van der Waal
The silted-up dam at Mount Fletcher
L
iving
L
and