Previous Page  178 / 311 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 178 / 311 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 179

A new Forest Act saw the light of day, introducing the promo-

tion of ‘good and multifunctional forestry’ as the primary

objective. Other new regulatory mechanisms paved the way for a

reinforcement of both private and public afforestation, including

the provision of new and additional financial resources as well as

new instruments for spatial planning.

The key principle governing afforestation in the new era of 1989

was the division of the country into three key categories of land:

Category 1

constituted areas, where afforestation should be given

the highest priority. State afforestation was primarily allocated

into this category and private landowners could receive grants for

afforestation 50 per cent higher than the rates available in areas of

category 2.

Category 2

constituted areas where private afforestation would

be encouraged with a standard rate public grant. However, in case

of shortage of grants (if demand exceeded available funds), priority

would be given to areas in category 1.

Category 3

constituted areas where afforestation would not be

allowed at all (unless in rare and exceptional cases and only after

concrete exemption). This could be areas with particular scenic

beauty or high conservation value nature sites.

It was established that the spatial planning for afforestation should

be based on a list of specified criteria aiming to ensure that the new

forest would be truly multifunctional. Thus, category 1 areas should

be allocated in particular where afforestation would promote one

or more of the following functions: 1) Recreational opportunities

for citizens, in particular in larger cities; 2) Groundwater protec-

tion, in particular sensitive resources suitable for drinking water; 3)

Ecological connectivity, aiming to enrich biological diversity and

reduce impacts of fragmentation.

The designation of the areas followed the normal Danish proce-

dures for spatial planning, implying broad public consultation

before final designation.

At the same time, in 1989, the Government formulated

a long-term goal for afforestation in Denmark, namely ‘to

double the forest cover in the course of a tree generation’

(from 11-12 per cent in 1989). Later, in the National

Forest Programme of 2001, it was formulated as a goal to

‘obtain approximately 20-25 per cent coverage of forest

landscapes during a period of 80-100 years’.

In line with the objectives of multifunctional

forestry, incentives were provided for a high share of

domestic broadleaved trees in the new grant schemes

for afforestation. This was in order to enhance the

recreational value and improve both biological diver-

sity and groundwater protection, still maintaining a

long-term potential for high-value timber production.

As a result, the vast majority of new forests became

dominated by domestic broadleaves, a radical shift

compared to the former afforestation, which had been

dominated by various fast-growing exotic conifers.

Strategy for Sustainable Forest Management

In 1994, following the ‘Forest Principles’ adopted

at UNCED in Rio 1992, and further building on the

outcomes of the pan-European ministerial collabora-

tion on forests (nowadays ‘Forest Europe’) as well as

other international commitments, the Danish govern-

ment developed a national Strategy for Sustainable

Forest Management.

The backbone of the strategy was the identification of

18 sub-themes (or criteria) relevant for promoting SFM

as outlined in relevant international commitments and

recommendations. It was underpinned by a number of

proposals for action working in support thereof in a

Danish context.

In early May, when the beech bursts into leaf, the character of the forest changes

dramatically. Here, a boy is collecting fresh beech leaves for his mother on Mothers’ Day

Former coppice forest attacked by Honey mushroom (

Armillaria

mellea

), by some seen as a pest in the forest, but by some mushroom

collectors seen as a delicate contribution to the mushroom basket

Image: ©Bert Wiklund

Image: ©Bert Wiklund