[
] 225
Tropical forests for local people
Steven Johnson, Communications Unit, International Tropical Timber Organization
T
he International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO)
has funded over 1,000 projects and activities contributing
to its mandate to promote sustainable forest management
(SFM) in the tropics over the Organization’s 25-year history.
These projects span a range of themes and topics relevant to
SFM. One of the most important areas of ITTO’s work, and
one of the most relevant to the International Year of Forests,
2011 theme of Forests for People, is its efforts to involve local
communities in SFM.
Forests are particularly important resources for the rural poor in
tropical countries, with over 800 million people living in forests
and woodlands in the tropics.
1
Forest communities include indig-
enous peoples and other local groups which have been living in
forest areas for significant periods, as well as more recent settlers or
immigrants. Many of the very poor are hunting or gathering tribes,
landless people living around forests and landless forest workers.
In addition to improving livelihoods by providing a subsistence
safety net, including food, shelter and fuelwood, the tropical forests
also provide communities and smallholders with a source of cash
income, a capital asset, a source of employment and an alternative
health-care system based on forest plants. More needs to be done
to improve the livelihood of forest-dependent people when they are
interested in moving from subsistence livelihoods towards market-
based activities. In many tropical zones, most local community cash
income from forests comes from collection and commercialization
of non-timber forest products such as bamboo, rattan, bushmeat,
wild medicinal and aromatic plants and forest fruits. The employ-
ment impact of these activities in the tropical rural areas is measured
in millions in both the informal and formal sectors, but reliable
estimates are lacking. However, due to poverty and difficult access,
many forest communities are living in conditions in which even the
most minimum standards for education, health, sanitation, potable
water, infrastructure and employment cannot be met.
Indigenous groups and communities own or are entitled to the
use of about 25 per cent of the forests in developing countries.
2
According to a recent assessment,
3
the forest area owned by commu-
nities and indigenous people in the ITTO developing member
countries
4
in 2008 was about 332 million hectares. This was about
51 million hectares (18 per cent) more than six years earlier,
demonstrating a strong trend to transfer formal ownership to forest
communities. However, there are various countries where commu-
nity forestry is not yet practised at all, or is still in the initial stages.
Community forests have existed for centuries and represent one
of the main forms of forest ownership. For instance, in Guatemala,
Mexico and Papua New Guinea, community ownership of forest
land has been the dominant tenure form for decades. More recently,
the Governments of Bolivia, Brazil, Cameroon, China, Colombia,
Ecuador, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras, India, Peru, Thailand and
Venezuela have revised their policies and legislation
for this purpose, some of them with ITTO assistance.
In addition to transferring or recognizing ownership
rights, various other arrangements are being applied in
the devolution of management or use rights to local
communities and their members.
The process is not, however, as simple as granting
communities title over forest areas, since this is usually
not sufficient to ensure SFM and the development of
community forest enterprises (CFEs). In general, forest
communities are poorly equipped to manage their forests
sustainably and to generate value through timber produc-
tion and various other benefits. One reason for this is that
the forest areas transferred to communities have often
been degraded lands with limited development potential
and a lack of investment in rehabilitation, which seriously
limits their role as a livelihood source for local people who
are in need of immediate tangible benefits.
In spite of the difficulties, community forest manage-
ment and enterprises represent a huge opportunity for
contributing to national development goals through
poverty reduction, sustainable socio-economic devel-
opment and environmental conservation in rural areas.
It has become clear that, given the right conditions and
incentives, communities can govern and manage forests
sustainably for a variety of objectives, and restore degraded
landscapes and ecosystems.
5
However, improvement is
generally needed in managing natural, human, financial,
physical and social assets by communities.
In order to address continued high poverty levels
in tropical countries due partly to the inadequate
capacity of indigenous peoples and forest communi-
ties to manage their forests and develop community
forest enterprises on a sustainable basis, in 2009 ITTO
established a Community Forest Management and
Enterprises (CFME) Thematic Programme.
6
Some of
the prominent causes of poverty and unsustainable
management of community forest resources are:
• Lack of clear land tenure and resource rights and
inappropriate legal and policy frameworks
• Poor organization of forest communities and limited
capacity among CFEs due lack of technical, business
and managerial skills
• Weak competitiveness in CFEs.
Land tenure is often insecure and resource rights have
not been clarified which is a major constraint for engag-
ing communities in such long-term endeavours as SFM.
Insecurity discourages sustainable practices in forest