Previous Page  86 / 311 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 86 / 311 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 87

mandate to facilitate national efforts to implement

sustainable forest management (SFM) and enhance

coordination among international instruments, organi-

zations and institutions with significant forest-related

responsibilities. The Collaborative Partnership on

Forests was established to assist the work of the UNFF.

The first review of the UNFF in 2005-2006 found its

members no closer to agreement on a forest law and,

in 2007, the UNFF and the United Nations General

Assembly adopted the Non-legally Binding Instrument

on All Types of Forests (NLBI). The NLBI creates a

framework for national action and international coop-

eration to enhance implementation of SFM and the

achievement of the four global objectives on forests

endorsed by the UNFF in 2006.

10

The NLBI thus stands as the main output of state-

centred efforts to create unified, forests-focused

governance. While the issue of a legally binding conven-

tion may be raised again in the next UNFF review,

scheduled for 2015, other forest-related developments

have been proceeding on largely parallel tracks and now

challenge the very existence of state-centric governance.

In the run-up to UNCED, for example, two new

conventions were developed: the Convention on

Biological Diversity and the UN Framework Convention

on Climate Change. Subsequently ratified by sufficient

numbers of signatories, they have created binding inter-

national law. The conferences of the parties to these

conventions have increasingly taken up forest-related

issues in the context of their own respective mandates

and in some cases, for example the Reduced Emissions

from Deforestation and Land Use Degradation (REDD)

and REDD+ processes for climate change mitigation,

succeeding in driving the global forest policy agenda.

A similar process has brought the signatories to other

UN conventions, on wetlands or desertification, for

Key components of forest governance

The origin of the current portfolio of international forest agree-

ments is usually considered to spring from the International

Tropical Timber Agreement. As with similar ‘trading and conserva-

tion’ regimes negotiated at around the same time, the ITTO proved

better at promoting trade than sustaining the resource and the 1980s

saw growing international concern about the continuing destruction

of tropical forests due to shifting agriculture, cattle ranching and

over-exploitation for timber production. At the same time, environ-

mentalists drew attention to the degradation and loss of temperate

and boreal forests due to industrial forestry practices and, in some

cases, pollution from intensive agriculture, along with urban and

industrial development. Along with the rising salience of environ-

mental issues came a recognition of the vital importance of forests

as renewable sources of a wide range of goods and services at local,

national and global levels, including food, medicine, fuel, shelter,

clean water, soil stabilization, flood control and livelihood support.

8

This contribution of forests to human well-being and to the newly

coined goal of sustainable development received global recognition in

1992 at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development

(UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, when leaders adopted Chapter 11 of

Agenda 21 on combating deforestation and the Non-legally Binding

Authoritative Statement of Principles for a Global Consensus on the

Management, Conservation and Sustainable Development of All Types

of Forests (the Forest Principles). These documents represented the first

attempt to reach a global consensus on the multiple benefits provided

by forests, the key elements of national policies needed to maintain

those benefits for present and future generations and the new forms

of international cooperation needed to support these national efforts.

At this point, many expected the international community to

move relatively quickly to negotiate a legally binding multilateral

agreement on forests on the basis of the Forest Principles. For

various reasons, such an agreement proved elusive.

9

As a compro-

mise between the parties who wished to negotiate a legally binding

instrument and those who opposed it, the United Nations Forum

on Forests (UNFF) was created in 2000 with a renewable five-year

Forests play a vital role in the provision of goods and services

Image: IUFRO

The challenge is to ensure that forest sustainability goals are met

amid competing objectives

Image: Matti Nummelin