

[
] 185
L
egal
F
ramework
at
the
N
ational
/I
nternational
L
evel
specific bank to finance infrastructure, with capital from
both countries. This legal and institutional arrangement
is unique in the world, and can be an excellent model
for cooperation in other transboundary basins.
operation of water utilities. For the first time in transboundary water
management, there is a model of support and international funding
for a specific border region, which includes a component of social
validation that is essential in the process of certification.
Since its inception, BECC has certified 130 water and wastewater
projects in the border region benefiting 12.8 million people. Total
investments on the Mexican border reached US$591.9 million, of
which US$287.7 million have come from EPA’s resources through
BEIF. As a result, indicators of service coverage have had very signif-
icant increases. In Mexico, these indicators between 1995 (the start
of BECC and NADBANK operations) and 2012 have increased from
89 per cent to 98 per cent in drinking water, 64 per cent to 93 per
cent in urban drainage, and 20.8 per cent to 87 per cent in waste-
water treatment (BECC statistics). These figures are well above the
average in Mexico.
Economic and population growth in this region – the highest
in the two countries and one of the largest in the world – along
with the expected climate change effects that, under most prob-
able scenarios, predict reductions in rainfall and therefore less water
availability, pose a future of greater scarcity which will test this
institutional arrangement. There is a clear need for major changes,
institutional strengthening and greater binational dialogue.
In short, the institutional arrangement reached between the US and
Mexico increases the binational water governance that has allowed
the solution of conflicts caused, for instance, by frequent droughts,
and has improved the water services in the region. The institu-
tions created include not only – as in other countries – a bilateral
commission for distribution of water or navigation regulation, but
also institutions responsible for environmental conservation and a
Main Mexico-US treaties and agreements related to
transboundary waters
Mexico-US Treaty of 1848
– Sets limits between both
countries and establishes sections of the Rio Grande and
Colorado River as borderlines between the two countries.
As a result, the basins of both rivers become international
transboundary basins.
Convention of 1889
– Sets the boundary commission (IBC),
the predecessor of IBWC, between the two countries.
1944 Water Treaty
– Distributes among the two countries
waters of the Colorado and Rio Grande rivers, introducing
commitments from Mexico to the US in the Rio Grande and from
the US to Mexico in the Colorado River. Extends the capabilities
of IBC to IBWC. Creates a system of dispute settlement.
La Paz Agreement, 1983
– Both countries agree to develop
joint actions to improve the environment in the border region.
Through this agreement the EPA and SEMARNAT develop
long-range joint programmes such as the current Border
2012 or the Border Infrastructure Program.
1993 Agreement for the creation of BECC and NADBANK
–
Under the agreement, signed in the context of NAFTA, these
two binational organizations are created and their operating
criteria established.
Public participation has made it possible to obtain support on controversial issues
Image: BECC