

[
] 157
Transformative learning
Moacir Gadotti, Director, Paulo Freire Institute, Brazil
O
ver the last few decades in particular, humankind
has developed at an extraordinary pace. Undoubtedly
a successful species in the fields of production and
technology, humans have followed a path of accelerated
economic growth that has had a direct effect on the way we
live. Unfortunately though, this way of life we have created for
ourselves is also having a directly negative impact on the Earth’s
ability to support us.
Human activity, and the impacts that our societies have had on the
Earth as a whole, has changed since the beginning of the Industrial
Revolution.
1
The variables include Northern hemisphere average
surface, population, CO
2
concentration, gross domestic profit, loss
of tropical rainforest and woodland, species extinctions, motor vehi-
cles, water use, paper consumption, fisheries exploitation, ozone
depletion and foreign investment – all of which have skyrocketed
in the last 50 years.
Because of the huge impact human activity has had, and continues
to have, on our planet, we are in a position where we need to find a
more sustainable way of living. Some preach that while our economy
continues to be built on the assumption of growth, sustainability
initiatives we adopt now are futile. While we cannot realistically
look to slow economic growth, there is a strong case for developing
a more sustainable economic model that allows for growth while
taking key environmental considerations into account. Today, we
cannot just continue to keep developing regardless. It is important
to grow with justice and respect for the environment.
So, what role do education and learning have in helping to achieve
this? If one accepts that the transformation of society and the trans-
formation of people are connected processes, then ultimately,
education and learning are fundamental to the creation of a more
sustainable future.
Modern education systems were born in Europe in the 19th
century at the height of industrial development and, despite the
real diversity between nations that adopted them later, these
systems are generally very similar. In the 20th century, educa-
tion systems were further strengthened by the expansion of the
right to education, enshrined in the 1947 Universal Declaration
of Human Rights. Despite this and the emergence of interna-
tional programmes for evaluating school performance, and the
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), we
begin the 21st century questioning our capacity to promote peace,
understanding and sustainability. Education is part of the problem
and part of the solution. We need to redefine it and we need to
promote transformative learning.
Essentially, the UN Decade of Education For Sustainable
Development (DESD) seeks to integrate the principles, values and
practices of sustainable development in all aspects of education
and learning to meet the needs of the present without
compromising those of future generations. This initia-
tive is, above all, a call for transformative action and
education to address planetary citizenship, and to create
a culture of peace and sustainability that promotes the
end of poverty and illiteracy in the world. It also aims
to promote education for emancipation: learning to
live sustainably, gender equality, human rights, educa-
tion for all, health, human security and intercultural
dialogue.
If we think in these terms, we can consider educa-
tion for sustainable development (ESD) as a great
opportunity to renew formal educational curricula
and align learning with environmental awareness.
Mathematics could involve working with data that
refers to the pollution of the environment or poverty
growth; linguistics could analyse the role played by
mass communication and publicity in consumption
habits; and history and social sciences could discuss
ethnic issues and gender inequality.
Regarding the impact of the concept of sustain-
ability on formal education, we need to consider
two levels. One, the legal level: educational reforms
(curriculum, contents). New behaviours can be
encouraged by the law. And two, the level of commit-
ment in society in general, especially among the
youth. In order to engage with young people and
gain their compliance in living sustainably, they need
to be not just taught, but motivated to think more
compassionately. After all, changing someone’s way
of life is not an entirely mechanical process.
On a policy level, governments need to establish links
between ESD and education for all; recognizing that the
purpose of education is not just to support economic
development, but to help individuals and societies meet
their full potential without undermining the health of
society and the environment at large. But at the grass-
roots level – schools – much can and must be done
by school leaders, teachers and students to integrate
sustainability into all aspects of school life and the
curriculum, drawing out the interconnections between
social, environmental, cultural and economic problems
and achievements. School-level initiatives can respond
best to the contexts, opportunities and needs of particu-
lar communities and the natural environment.
In order for educational programmes to achieve
this, sustainability needs to underline all principles,
values and attitudes taught. This requires the estab-