Previous Page  143 / 288 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 143 / 288 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 144

D

isaster

R

isk

R

eduction

The sequence of the storm event and actions taken were:

Day 1, Thursday 30 May

– DMC concluded that an important

precipitation event would occur in central Chile during 3 and 4

June. A watch was sent to ONEMI.

Day 2, Friday 31 May

– DMC confirmed its prediction. A warning

was issued to ONEMI, which informed the Minister of Internal

Affairs about the imminent hazardous weather event. The National

Committee for Emergency (NCE) was called to meet the next day.

Day 3, Saturday 1 June

–The NCEmet at the National Governmental

Palace. The director of DMC informed the authorities about the

extreme precipitation event that would affect the central part of

Chile. First actions to face the event were taken by the Minister of

Internal Affairs.

Day 4, Sunday 2 June

– Precipitation began late in the afternoon.

With updated information, DMC forecasted that the event could be

worst than was first thought. A new warning was issued to ONEMI

and the general public.

Day 5, Monday 3 June

– At 12.00 Coordinated Universal Time

(UTC) Santiago measured 56.2 mm in 12 hours. This is almost 72

per cent of the normal precipitation for June. First consequences of

the storm were seen on the TV in the morning news. DMC contin-

ued to issue a warning to say the precipitation was expected to

continue for two more days. The President called and presided over

the second and third NCE meeting, which took place on this day.

Day 6, Tuesday 4 June

– At 12.00 UTC Santiago measured 111.1

mm during the past 24 hours, the highest amount ever measured

by this station. The NCE met twice again on this day to evaluate the

current situation and the possible future scenario.

Day 7, Wednesday 5 June

– Precipitation had decreased in inten-

sity; at 12.00 UTC a total of 44.5 mm was measured for the past 24

hours. With updated information, DMC forecasted that the event

would end sometime in the afternoon on this day, as it did. The NCE

met twice on this day.

Day 8, Thursday 6 June

– At 12.00 UTC Santiago measured only

4 mm for the past 24 hours. The event accumulated a total of 215.8

mm; about 70 per cent of the normal annual precipitation. The

weather advices ended. The NCE met for the last time, as the emer-

gency had passed. The President thanked all participants especially

DMC through its Director.

Consequences

Damage to public and private goods totalled millions of

dollars. The cost in public infrastructure was US$650

million. The building sector lost about US$10 million

due to absenteeism and temporary stops. Around 25,000

houses were damaged and 272 destroyed, at a cost of US$29

million. Workforce absenteeism of 30 per cent on the first

day and 50 on the second day carried an implied cost of

U$176 million and 264 million, or 0.2 per cent and 0.4 per

cent of gross domestic product respectively. Early closure of

stores and malls implied an 80 per cent drop in sales. The

cost related to the population was around U$2.2 million.

Finally, seven people died due to the EWE.

Providing an accessible service

Even though EWE’s are inevitable, early detection and fore-

casting can trigger actions that, in part, avoid and mitigate

negative impacts for people and their property. DMC plays

an essential role as it is responsible for alerting people when

a weather-related disaster may occur. In this context, DMC

is first in the chain of decision makers helping to prevent

disasters in the community. The Common Alerting Protocol

between DMC and ONEMI aims to establish a two-way

communication in order to adequately inform the authori-

ties and public. This enables them to take actions that will

prevent and mitigate the threats of an extreme weather

event or any weather system that can be threat. The event

described here indicates that, because a warming was issued

by DMC, the governmental authorities took administrative

decisions that allowed them to better face the consequences

associatedwith the event. The EWEwas possible to forecast

because of the availability of numerical weather prediction

accessible through internet. In this regard, access to numeri-

cal forecast products is important for developing countries

and countries with economies in transition. Finally, visibility

of the weather service is important as the official source of

weather related alerts; this enables confusion to be avoided

and provides accurate information to authorities, private

and public organizations and the general public.

Consequences associated with the EWE of 3-5 June 2002

Source: DMC

Houses with

minor damage

People in shelters

Affected people

Region

IV

V

VI

VII

VIII

IX

Metropolitan

Total

727

24,441

24,613

1,962

820

8

133,156

185,727

57

1,793

108

16

0

8

4,278

6,260

220

9,294

1,733

226

185

1

9,965

21,624

51

1,795

164

11

0

0

1,306

3,327

0

242

5

0

0

0

25

272

Houses with major

damage

Houses destroyed