

[
] 224
Making climate science useful: cross-regional
learning from Kenya and Senegal
Emma Visman, Humanitarian Futures Programe, King’s College London; Dr Arame Tall, Consultative Group on
International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Programme;
Richard Ewbank, Christian Aid; Professor Dominic Kniveton, University of Sussex;
Dr Mariane Diop Kane, Head of Forecasting and Observational Networks Department,
Agence Nationale de l’Aviation Civile et de la Météorologie du Sénégal;
Dr Richard Jones, UK Met Office Hadley Centre; Ezekiel M Njoroge, Kenya Meteorological Department;
and Dr Andy Morse, University of Liverpool
I
n 2009 the Humanitarian Futures Programme (HFP) based
at King’s College London initiated a series of pilot two-way
exchanges between a number of international climate scientists
and humanitarian organizations. This process led to the develop-
ment of a collaborative proposal between climate scientists and
meteorologists from national meteorological departments and
universities in Kenya, Senegal and the UK,
1
and policymakers from
a number of international humanitarian organizations
2
and the
partners and communities with whom they work. Together, these
partners are undertaking two demonstration studies to assess how
climate science can better support humanitarian, disaster risk
reduction and development decision-making.
Communities living in the arid and semi-arid areas of Kenya are
largely dependent on rain-fed agriculture and livestock production
and are increasingly vulnerable. More than 75 per cent of Kenya’s
population works in the agriculture sector, and is highly vulnerable
to climate shocks. In recent years, the Mbeere district has frequently
received inadequate rainfall and experienced a succession of poor
harvests and associated high levels of livestock mortality.
Mbeere district is the focus of a demonstration study that involves
climate scientists from national meteorological departments and
universities in Kenya and the UK partnering with policymakers
from national and international humanitarian and development
organizations. The study supports the development of an integrated
cross-disciplinary approach with the aim of helping to improve
the capacity of vulnerable communities to respond to climate and
weather risks and advance climate scientists’ understanding of the
climate information needs of humanitarian users. It is one of a series
of two pilot exchanges initiated in 2011 by the HFP based at King’s
College London, and embedded within a three-year Christian Aid
Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihoods Innovation project (SALI).
A parallel demonstration study in the Kaffrine district of Senegal is
also underway (see the following case study). This article seeks to
identify and draw together generic learning from across the demon-
stration studies in both Senegal and Kenya.
The exchange approach has provided an unforeseen framework
for innovation, creating the linkages and space to develop new
approaches which offer the potential to better meet users’ information
needs including regular forecast updates by SMS in local
languages direct to key community actors. The process
includes community-based evaluation, technical reviews
of the provision and use of climate information following
each season and the development of approaches which
support direct and more effective dialogue between the
providers and users of emerging climate science.
Building on past efforts
Efforts to strengthen systematic response to risks identi-
fied by science are not new. There are a multitude of
early-warning systems, including seasonal rainfall and
crop forecasts; nutritional and epidemiological surveys;
networks of earthquake and tsunami early warning
systems; and volcano monitoring stations. Each operates
at different geographic and temporal scales, offering fore-
casts with differing levels of certainty. Often the barriers
to effective use of scientific forecasts are not related to
a lack of information, but to lack of political will to act;
inability or unwillingness to invest in risk-based preven-
tion; lack of understanding regarding probabilistic
information or appropriate forms of action to take; or
not ensuring that timely, relevant information reaches
those who are able to take independent action.
There is a need to break the cyclical nature of crises in
regions vulnerable to climate hazards, and to contextual-
ize weather and climate information within the complex
multi-hazard environments in which these crises occur.
There are a number of major international frame-
works guiding humanitarian and development
initiatives due for review in the coming few years.
This exchange project answers the principles of the
World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Global
Framework for Climate Services, offering significant
opportunities to establish more systematic and inte-
grated use of weather and climate information at all
levels of humanitarian, disaster risk reduction (DRR)
and development decision-making and so to address
some of the drivers of persisting vulnerability.
C
ommunities