Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  281 / 336 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 281 / 336 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 281

E

conomic

D

evelopment

and

W

ater

in huge public health risks. Finally, there is cascading use of waste-

water for irrigation of urban agriculture, a common practice in many

cities in sub-Saharan Africa. The cascading use of wastewater has the

advantage that the scarce water resources are used multiple times,

but it increases public health risks by spreading the pathogens in

the wastewater. The integrated framework designed for sub-Saharan

Africa must explore solutions for safe cascading use of wastewater

for urban agriculture.

Because the infrastructure is often different in sub-Saharan Africa

than in developed countries, many water demand management meas-

ures that are applicable in the latter cannot be implemented in these

developing countries.

4

An integrated urban water framework designed

specifically for African cities must recognize these differences and the

limitations they create. For example, many African cities have a very old

water distribution infrastructure which creates leakage levels of 30-50

per cent. Under these conditions, leakage management programmes

provide a huge opportunity for IUWM in African cities. Unfortunately,

when the water supply is intermittent and distribution pressures are

low, many water-saving devices for toilets, bathrooms and kitchens

may not be effective. Further, in water-scarce conditions where the

population already uses water efficiently, the potential for further water-

saving measures is limited. An IUWM framework designed specifically

for African conditions must select technologies which are suitable for

the conditions in African cities. For example, treatment technologies

which could not work with intermittent energy supply (such as acti-

vated sludge) are not applicable and more robust technologies such as

stabilization ponds should be applied.

By improving the understanding of the highly complex interactions

between the different parts of the African urban water cycle, an IUWM

framework designed for Africa facilitates a structured and integrated

analysis and supports an integrated decision-making process.

IUWM strategies for Arua

Although the integrated framework may seem

straightforward, its application on the ground is chal-

lenging. The new integrated approach to urban water

management has been applied in a recently prepared

feasibility study for Arua, Uganda, funded by the

World Bank.

5

Comparable concepts are proposed

for feasibility studies in Mbale, Uganda and Nairobi,

Kenya. Arua is a rapidly emerging town located in

northern Uganda. It is experiencing a critical short-

age of water and the main water source, the Enyau

River, is affected by the increasing water demands

of upstream users, exacerbating the water shortage

problem. The current water supply is not sufficient

to meet the existing demand, and with an estimated

population growth of up to 200 per cent in the next

20 years the problem will increase. In addition to

the water shortage problem, Arua also lacks adequate

sanitation provisions, with dysfunctional pit latrines,

open defecation and untreated wastewater posing

both health risks and water pollution risks. In order

to cope with these challenges, a feasibility study for

future water supply and sanitation was developed

applying the integrated framework.

Based on the integrated framework, the feasi-

bility study proposes that in Arua surface water,

groundwater, artificial aquifer recharge and recycled

wastewater (grey and black) should all be consid-

ered as potential water sources, resulting in increased

water security (security by diversity). This strategy

includes changing the way we think and the way we

20,000

18,000

16,000

14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

2032

Surface water – Anyau River (existing operating capacity)

Groundwater

Surface water (upgrading abstraction from Enyau River)

Greywater (Cluster 6, 8 and 9)

Greywater (Cluster 1, 2 and 7)

Waste water reuse (Cluster 3, 4 and 5)

Surface water (Dam at Enyau River)

= Water demand

Estimated water demand and proposed water resources for Arua

Source: Vairavamoorthy et al, 2012