

[
] 63
T
ransboundary
W
ater
M
anagement
human needs at risk – a position that shocked Australians. The
drought not only highlighted the vulnerability of businesses and
communities, it also demonstrated the implications of neglecting
the water needs of the environment.
In 2000, a major national land and water audit found that almost
a third of the continent’s surface and groundwater resources were
close to being overused, or were overused compared to their esti-
mated sustainable flow regimes.
2
The Council of Australian Governments again stepped in. In 2004,
the council members signed off on the Intergovernmental Agreement
on a National Water Initiative (NWI), which set out detailed commit-
ments to improve institutional water sharing arrangements and to
overcome some of the seemingly intractable differences between states
that shared water resources. It established as an overarching goal the
optimization of economic, social and environmental outcomes.
Under the NWI the Council of Australian Governments created a
new body – the National Water Commission – to oversee imple-
mentation of the reform programme and to provide regular reviews.
This type of institutionalized, regular review framework is unusual
and has been instrumental in driving ongoing improvements in the
delivery of a truly national water reform agenda.
The NWI comprises different types of commitments that together
will improve water management in Australia. There are state-specific
commitments and commitments applicable to groups of states, such
as water trading among the southern Murray-Darling Basin states.
There are also commitments that can only be delivered through
cooperation by all states.
Just as importantly, the NWI commits governments to genuinely
engage with people and groups affected by water management
changes when developing water plans that balance the competing
needs and values of water users with the desired outcomes for the
environment in particular water systems. This is beneficial because
it makes decisions regarding water allocation and use transparent,
and provides an opportunity for interested parties to be
part of the decision-making process.
In the eight years since the NWI was signed, the agree-
ment has come to be recognized internationally as a model
for sound water governance, for addressing the challenges
of cross-jurisdictional management of shared resources,
and for harnessing the power of markets and price signals
to encourage efficient water use and investment.
In an assessment of Australia’s environmen-
tal performance since 1998, the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development concluded
that the NWI, backed by significant government
investment, was delivering real progress toward
reform, including setting environmental flow
regimes.
3
As the Australian State of the Environment
Report 2011
4
observed, “the past decade has been the
most dynamic and significant in modern Australia’s
water history. It has been a period of ambitious water
policy reform at the same time as the worst and
longest drought Australia has ever seen. There have
also been massive public and private investments
in water infrastructure, significant new foundations
for water knowledge at a national scale, and the
widespread acceptance by the public and by govern-
ments that Australia’s climate has changed and will
continue to change.”
The Australian approach acknowledges that success-
ful reform requires cross-agency and cross-government
collaborative effort. Behind these concepts are coop-
erative, multilayered and evolving relationships; albeit
relationships underpinned by a sound legislative and
accountability framework that is supported by robust
systems and processes.
The NWI explicitly recognizes the interests of indigenous people in water management
Image: National Water Commission, Arthur Mostead
Indigenous engagement
The NWI is the first intergovernmental water agreement
in Australia that explicitly recognizes the interests
of indigenous people in water management. Since
2004 most Australian jurisdictions have established
consultative mechanisms intended to engage indigenous
people in water planning, and there is increased
recognition of the cultural values of water resources.
In 2010 the National Water Commission brokered the
formation of the First People’s Water Engagement Council.
The group’s remit was to provide a vehicle for Aboriginal
voices and water aspirations to be heard.
The council consulted widely with stakeholders and held
its first water summit in 2012. From these processes, the
council developed policy and advisory statements. When
the council ended its tenure in 2012, an Indigenous Water
Advisory Council was formed to continue building on the
First People’s Water Engagement Council’s initial work,
taking on an even larger role as national adviser to the
federal government.
The advisory council, along with other indigenous
working groups, indigenous community facilitation
networks, and projects aimed at improving drinking water
and increasing research opportunities, will continue to
provide an important foundation for improving knowledge
and understanding of indigenous Australians’ water-
related cultural, social and economic aspirations.