

[
] 260
spectral resolution mapping of biodiversity related activities. However,
alone, even systematic satellite-based biodiversity monitoring is not
able to reveal changes in biodiversity (past data records are partially
incomplete, discontinuous, or simply not long enough to monitor rele-
vant changes). On the predictive side, Earth observation is well suited
for now-casting applications, but cannot predict the future evolution
of ecosystems.
Continental, or even global, scale Earth observation at larger spatial
resolution (typically 0.25 to 1 kilometre) using instruments such as
MERIS on ENVISAT, MODIS on Aqua/Terra, or NOAA/AVHRR, cannot
be directly used for individual and indicator species identification.
However, these data are well suited to derive dominant species compo-
sition or depict abundances of plant functional types (PFTs).
Spatio-temporal disaggregation schemes, evidential reasoning and
data assimilation are often part of such applications. In addition, given
that sufficient temporal resolution data are available, products such
as vegetative change cover and species-specific phenological indicators
may be further derived. These products are well suited to initialize
and parameterize ecological models that predict vegetation develop-
ment or dynamics. However, not many of the existing vegetation
models are ready to directly assimilate Earth observation data.
Regional scale biodiversity assessment, which has a typical spatial
resolution between 0.5 and 30 metres, has been pioneered by Landsat
sensors. In this category, instruments such as Landsat ETM+, CHRIS
on PROBA, EO-1 Hyperion, HyMap, and NASA JPL AVIRIS are named
most frequently. Semantic interoperability and proper interfacing
sampling design, as well as schemes between ecological and Earth
observation activities are the most important factors driving the success
of this bottom-up scaling-based approach.
Indicator species mapping is only possible if the spatial resolution
is at a fraction of the species size, otherwise only dominant species
mapping can be performed. Recent imaging spectrometers have
contributed to the mapping of quantitative vegetation biochemical
and structural parameters (such as, concentrations of leaf biochem-
istry, assessment of foliar pigments), disturbance occurrence, and
invasive species. These applications have the potential to contribute
to vegetation modelling. However, many of these models (for example,
SMART/SUMO/NTM model suite to predict floristic diversity) have
been developed without Earth observation input in mind.
Combined disaggregation/aggregation scheme: towards habitat
abundance mapping
Large-scale characterization of ecosystems, landscape diversity and
functions is in increasing demand, particularly at finer spatial resolu-
tion and temporal scales. While large-scale stratification using climatic
data may be sufficient to define broad eco-regions, combining it with
landscape spatial information allows a variety of subclasses to be iden-
tified at a finer scale. Such landscapes consist of a multitude of habitats
and plant communities of coexisting biological species. A method
combining disaggregation of remotely sensed data with evidential
reasoning can produce probability maps of dominant plant species
habitats. Such maps can be re-aggregated to produce fractional abun-
dances of PFTs.
The PFTs represent important input into dynamic vegetation models
(Sitch et al., 2003),
5
because they have the capacity to forecast floris-
tic diversity under various scenarios. The PFT maps allow the
evaluation of results from scenarios initiated in the past (for example,
using a historical pollen distribution database) as well as to assess the
potential accuracy of future projections.
A current disaggregation scheme in development is
based on a pan-European dataset. The approach relies on
identifying all major habitats in Europe defined in accor-
dance with Annex I of the Habitat Directive, which
specifies 198 distinct habitats (Mücher et al., 2005).
6
The
data set is compiled using current state-of-the-art land
cover databases (namely CORINE, PELCOM and
GCL2000). Harmonization of the data sets is imple-
mented as far as possible according to the CORINE land
cover nomenclature to avoid loss of information.
Additional stratification and evidential reasoning is
used by integrating datasets such as biogeographic
regions, digital elevation, soil information and other
geographic and topographic data to finally arrive at a
probabilistic species distribution of a particular habitat.
These maps can support better management of protected
areas, allowing monitoring of the long-term stability of
ecosystems, identification of potential species reintro-
duction sites and finally, protection of the original
ecosystem species against invasive species by predicting
their potential colonization areas.
Towards dominant species mapping
Using a remote sensing-based approach of vegetation
sampling in the field may lead to significantly differing
results compared to a more traditional vegetation mapping
scheme, such as the method of Braun-Blanquet. Remote
sensing approaches will always spatially integrate infor-
mation over the instantaneous field of view (IFOV). This
results in spectrally mixed radiometric quantities affected
by the most dominant species and the fraction of non-
photosynthetic vegetation and soil in vertical projection.
Ecological sampling schemes, however, frequently
focus on indicator species sampling, where these indica-
tor species may have no significant spatial abundance in
the sampled area. Recent advances in measurement of leaf
optical properties combined with advanced radiative
transfer (RT) modelling (for example, PROSPECT/SAIL),
allow in forward mode, to-scale leaf biochemistry and
structural parameters up to higher scales. They also allow
an inverted mode to retrieve vegetation biochemical and
structural properties from the reflectance signal measured
within the sensor IFOV. Spectral libraries of leaf optical
properties can be used to spectrally unmix large areas and
derive abundances of dominant species, given that all
dominant species are represented well in the library.
Further analysis of dominant species abundance results
in solid estimates of vegetation net primary productivity
(NPP). This is approximated from remotely sensed light
use efficiency (proxied by the photochemical reflectance
index (PRI), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR),
and the fraction of PAR absorbed by photosynthetic
tissues. The latter, being basically a function of leaf area
index (LAI), is again retrievable from spectrometric data
by inversion of RT models.
These advanced remote sensing product combinations
can serve as an input to dynamic vegetation models, such
as the SMART (soil processes), SUMO (vegetation
processes and succession), and NTM (potential floristic
S
OCIETAL
B
ENEFIT
A
REAS
– B
IODIVERSITY