Previous Page  198 / 287 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 198 / 287 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 199

Managing risk in a changing climate

Stephen E. Zebiak, International Research Institute for Climate and Society

W

e live in a time of rapidly escalating concern about

climate change. Although scientific evidence has been

steadily building over many years, only recently has

the consensus concerning observed impacts and future scenarios

reached a level to capture the world’s attention. Increasingly, the

question of the reality of climate change is being replaced with

the question of what to do about the problem. It is also increas-

ingly appreciated that the response will require concerted efforts

not only to control atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions, but

to adapt to and manage the effects of climate change as well.

Climate shocks in the form of droughts, floods, cyclones, and

related problems such as epidemics, food insecurity, infrastructure

loss and the like have been playing out year by year, throughout

recorded history, but with increasing severity as populations are

becoming increasingly vulnerable. A growing body of evidence

points to the direct effects of climate on economic and human

development, particularly in low-income countries. The ability

to cope better with the climate is thus a paramount issue of the

present, and a potentially even greater issue in the foreseeable

future. ‘Win-win’ approaches to better manage current climate

risks, and to build capability to cope with the climate of the future,

are especially needed.

Many of the world’s leading development institu-

tions – including the United Nations Development

Programme, the World Bank, regional development

banks, foundations, bilaterals and non-governmen-

tal organizations – recognize that efforts to meet

development goals, in particular the Millennium

Development Goals, are threatened by climate

risk. As a result, they have begun reviewing their

programmes from the perspective of climate-related

risk assessment and risk management. Similarly,

national governments and decision makers at the

local and regional levels are now asking how they

can better manage climate-related risk.

A great deal of relevant information is now

available to assist these efforts. Under the United

Nations Framework Convention on Climate

Change, and particularly through the work on the

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),

authoritative assessments of the current climate and

possible future climate scenarios are readily avail-

able. In addition, routine monitoring information

and seasonal-to-interannual climate forecasts are

available in several centres. In practice, however, it

has proven difficult to cast this information in terms

that can inform decisions and policies in key socio-

economic sectors. As a result, little uptake has been

achieved and livelihoods and economies remain

vulnerable to climate risk.

The work needed to provide problem-specific

information and to advance innovations in the use

of such information is the science of climate risk

management practice. This work is especially chal-

lenging because it involves a complex interplay

between physical, natural, and social systems and

requires that practitioners engage with good science,

good policy, and good practice. At present there are

some organizations working to connect these dispa-

rate disciplines – but while their work has provided

examples of practical ways to manage climate risk,

the demand for useable knowledge and information

far outstrips what can be provided.

If the global community is to become serious

about managing climate risks, it must close the gap

between knowledge and practice. In addition to major

programmes in climate assessment, international

policy, and development assistance, the global commu-

nity must also provide a mechanism to advance climate

risk management practice.

R

isk

G

overnance

and

M

anagement

Farmers in Chile, part of South America’s Southern Cone region

Image: Curt Carnemark/World Bank