

[
] 49
E
VEN IN COUNTRIES
where the information and communi-
cation technology (ICT) infrastructure is well developed,
the use of e-systems by enterprises shows great disparity.
This is the reason for the shift of emphasis from digital divide to
use-divide. We have come to the conclusion that the use-divide
is not due to the weaknesses of e-solutions but to managerial
weaknesses. These weaknesses are either related to the inability
of managers to decide where and when to use e-solutions and for
what purpose, or to their inability to assess the impact of e-solu-
tions on other areas of business management. In both cases,
suggestions on e-solutions must go hand in hand with manage-
rial solutions or must be made after making sure that the
management competence is there.
There are many definitions of e-business, the most frequent one
being the conduct of business on the Internet. Let us take a broader
view and define e-business as the application of ICT in macro-,
meso- and micro-level business management processes. E-busi-
ness, or e-trade, captured the attention of policy-makers and
strategists as early as the 1980s. While developed industrialized
countries expanded their telecommunication infrastructures and
incorporated ICT solutions in business management, developing
countries, lacking the infrastructure, fell further behind. At that
point the debate on the digital divide started.
A lot has been written about the ‘digital divide’.
1
Its adverse
effects on poverty alleviation and economic development have
been the subject of hundreds of articles and books. The World
Summit on the Information Society, the first phase of which was
held in Geneva in December 2003, further fed the debate.
2
There
is, in fact, some debate as to what the digital divide actually refers
to – a gap in infrastructure, in access, in ICT know-how – and
whether it is widening or diminishing.
3
Numerous initiatives for
bridging the digital divide have been suggested; some were tried,
many have failed. A common theme of these initiatives was the
infrastructure, or more correctly the inadequacy of the infra-
structure in developing countries.
4
As well as the building of
state-of-the-art telecommunication infrastructure being beyond
the means of developing countries, market mechanisms to ensure
the efficient distribution and use of scarce resources were also
lacking. Thus, the digital divide seems to have widened at the
expense of many developing countries.
While some developing countries continued to suffer as they
did not have adequate telecommunication infrastructure and
developed ICT sectors, others were able to improve theirs. This
is, for instance, the case with Senegal and the Philippines.
5
Quite
a few developing countries have had the opportunity to build
telecommunication infrastructures matching western standards,
at least in major centres. Even then, due to various reasons that
have been well documented, many individuals and institutions
still did not have access. Hence, the phrase ‘access divide’.
Distorted market mechanisms leading to high costs, unavailable
and/or unreliable communication systems, poor ICT standards,
etc, were listed as the culprits for the access divide.
6
In many
places the attention shifted therefore from digital divide to access
divide. As infrastructure improved, albeit not enough, in many
developing countries, the divide between the haves and the have-
nots was no longer an issue between countries but within
countries as well. Thus both the digital divide and the access
divide concepts broadened their relevance to inter- and intra-
country use of ICT.
A rather curious phenomenon is now attracting attention. Even
in countries where the telecommunication infrastructure is devel-
oped and the ICT sector seems to have the sophistication needed,
the use of ICT by those who are expected to apply it is lagging
behind. A very common observation both in developed and devel-
oping countries indicates that especially at the small and
medium-size enterprise (SME) level, the use of ICT by SMEs is far
from what is expected. In countries where there is little or no
digital or access divide, there is therefore the ‘use-divide’.
The use-divide
The use-divide is quite simple to describe. Although there is both
adequate telecommunication infrastructure and sufficient access,
ICT use, by SME managers in particular, seems to be lacking. The
extent of this trend is such that SME managers fall behind most
private users in the utilization of the Internet in their countries.
In the same countries some enterprises, especially bigger ones, use
the ICT availability almost to its full extent.
7
Hence the use-divide.
Interestingly enough, it happens that most enterprises utilizing
ICT are in the supply chains of bigger foreign buyers.
8
This is not
a coincidence. The buyers, especially the big buyers of developed
countries, insist that their suppliers build up their capability to
transact on the Internet. In other words, most ICT customers are
customers because their buyers want them to be.
Regarding those enterprises that are not in the supply chain of
big buyers, either because they cannot or because they have delib-
erately chosen to pursue niche markets, the utilization of ICT is
low. The case of SMEs is particularly marked. Except those that
are forced by their buyers to adopt ICT, most seem to have little
or no interest in this modern day wonder called e-business.
9
In business management, the use of ICT tends to come down
to the use of the Internet. The fact is that the use of ICT in busi-
ness management has not been clearly defined in generic terms.
Discussions on the topic have always been in terms of cases and
examples. Although there is no question that buying and selling
on the Internet are examples of ICT use in business, they certainly
are not the only examples.
A programme executed by the International Trade Centre (ITC)
that is designed to address the use-divide, uses a model that
provides a generic definition called the e-Trade Bridge Paradigm
(ETBP).
10
Based on the Business Management System (BMS)
From digital divide to use-divide
International Trade Centre