Previous Page  44 / 85 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 44 / 85 Next Page
Page Background

• Preparedness for outbreaks of avian influenza in humans is in

place and information material has been distributed to health care

facilities in many countries

• Initial preparations have been established on whole-of-society

preparedness

• Unicef outbreak communication training has been undertaken in

many of the SEE countries

• Avian influenza exercises have been undertaken in several coun-

tries and an inter-country exercise was undertaken in 2008.

Experience from these exercises is useful for future pandemic

preparedness exercises in and between countries

• All countries have been provided access to the EISS platform

(www.eiss.org

) to report seasonal influenza and currently five

countries are reporting to the weekly bulletin.

Next steps

Although progress has been made on pandemic preparedness in SEE,

there are still several areas of pandemic preparedness that have not yet

been addressed and areas that need to be revised and strengthened.

Based on assessment visits to countries, the recent SEE workshop

on pandemic preparedness and the new WHO guidance document,

countries are encouraged to revise and update their plans and make

sure that they are operational. By implementing country-specific

recommendations and following the new WHO guidance, pandemic

preparedness in SEE will grow stronger in the coming years. Stronger

pandemic preparedness will have an impact on the countries’ general

emergency preparedness and defence against communicable diseases

other than influenza, as well as contributing to the implementation

of the International Health Regulations.

In addition to the overall recommendation to revise pandemic

plans following country-specific recommendations and the new

WHO guidance, the main areas of pandemic preparedness which

countries are encouraged to address in the coming year are:

Preparedness beyond the health sector

– countries are encouraged

to initiate pandemic preparedness planning in sectors other than the

health sector in order to ensure the continuity of essential functions

in society during a pandemic. To initiate this process, it is vital that

one ministry (typically the health ministry) takes the lead in inform-

ing other ministries about the importance and relevance of their

involvement in pandemic preparedness planning. This topic will be

addressed in the new WHO guidance on pandemic preparedness.

Planning at regional and local level

– planning is not simply a matter

of having a good national preparedness plan. It is essential to build capac-

ity at lower administrative levels and to involve all levels in the planning

process. Municipalities will need to develop pandemic plans and hospi-

tals, power plants and water and food suppliers will need to develop

business continuity plans to ensure that they can continue their essen-

tial functions throughout a pandemic. It is also important to coordinate

pandemic preparedness with general emergency plans within a country.

Strengthening interoperability in SEE

– countries are encouraged to

collaborate on pandemic preparedness planning and through joint

planning efforts, create a strong regional preparedness. Countries are

also recommended to review pandemic plans of neighbouring coun-

tries and to learn from each other. Interoperability was addressed

during the assessment visits as well as during the recent SEE work-

shop and, as a result, a SEE working group on regional interoperability

in pandemic preparedness will be created.

Exercises

– pandemic plans need to be tested in exercises, to ascertain

that they are sufficient and realistic. This is an important component of

preparedness planning and needs to be done at a national

as well as a local level. Testing plans is a useful way to iden-

tify gaps and to harmonize plans with existing outbreak

response or emergency preparedness plans. Plans should

be updated according to lessons learned during the exer-

cise. In addition to in-country exercises, international

exercises are also considered beneficial, and could be consid-

ered for SEE when all countries have well established

national pandemic plans.

Conclusion

To date, countries as well as external partners have

focused their efforts on strengthening avian influenza

contingency plans, which is a crucial step in enabling

detection and, if possible, containing the spread of a new

human influenza virus. Significant achievements have

been made in this field and countries have developed

their capacity to respond to outbreaks of avian influenza

in animals as well as humans. It is now time for involved

stakeholders, national as well as external, to focus more

on strengthening preparedness against a pandemic.

3

[

] 44

The SEE HN

The SEE countries have experienced drastic changes in the past

20 years. War, and economic and political tumult led to periods

of civil unrest, political crises and in many areas a cessation of

community services. This has led to a number of difficulties

including adverse impacts on health care, which threatened their

populations in many ways.

In 2001 the SEE HN was established and a commitment was

made by the signatories of the Dubrovnik Pledge to improve

health in the region. SEE ministers of health agreed to work

together and implement nine regional public health projects

(mental health, communicable disease surveillance, food safety

and nutrition, blood and blood components safety, tobacco

control, maternal and neonatal health, health information

systems, medical emergency services, and public health

services). The governments of Belgium, France, Greece,

Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom support

the projects both technically and financially.

The SEE HN has become a political forum of regional

cooperation in public health of the highest level. SEE countries

will assume full ownership of this cooperation in 2009 by

establishing a new SEE HN Secretariat and regional health

development centres on the specific technical areas of

cooperation as outlined by the Dubrovnik and Scopje pledges.

In 2002 the project of strengthening surveillance and control of

communicable diseases was started and all countries are

committed to collaborate and establish a network of experts. A

number activities within the project such as training on applied

epidemiology and surveillance, establishing and assessment of

surveillance systems, seasonal influenza and the International

Health Regulations took place throughout 2002-2008 and

others are scheduled in 2009 and beyond.

Most of the activities related to pandemic preparedness are

supported by the Belgian Government. The project management

office is in Tirana, Albania. For further information please contact

the SEE HN Secretariat. Contact information can be found on the

WHO Regional Office for Europe website:

www.euro.who.int/stabilitypact as well as

http://cdsinssee.org.