

[
] 233
Understanding the coupled human-environmental
Earth system: science without borders
Kevin Noone, International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP)
A
n enduring legacy of the Apollo space programme of the
1960s is the iconic ‘Earthrise’ image of our planet taken
from the perspective of a tiny spacecraft in orbit around the
moon. It was the first time that millions of humans had the oppor-
tunity to see our home planet as a single entity. They got a glimpse
of a connected system that transcended the political, social,
economic and even scientific boundaries humans have projected
onto it. Continents, oceans, clouds, and the fantastically thin shell
that is our atmosphere all appeared together as a beautiful whole.
From a scientific perspective, these images helped to stimulate us
to rediscover the science of the Earth system.
The Earth system has been connected on a planetary scale since life
first appeared on it more than three billion years ago. Ever since, the
Earth has existed as a highly coupled, interdependent system of compo-
nents and processes, all of which operate on a multitude of temporal
and spatial scales. Throughout most of our history, humans have only
viewed and experienced the Earth system on small scales: through the
prism of our villages and settlements, and later our cities and nations.
Even though humans have transformed the environment in very impor-
tant ways throughout history, it has only been in the last century or so
that human activities have begun to match (and often exceed) the
natural forces that regulate the Earth system. Recent ice core data show
that current levels of carbon dioxide and methane are well outside the
range of natural variability over the last 800,000 years.
Roughly half of the world’s ice-free land surface has been altered by
human actions. Humans now fix more nitrogen than nature does.
Particles emitted by human activities alter the energy balance of the
planet, as well as having adverse effects on human health. These may
seem unrelated issues; however, over recent decades we have gained a
deeper understanding of the degree to which all of these separate issues
are linked. The Earth system is very complex with myriad feedbacks,
and has exhibited rapid, global-scale responses to changes in environ-
mental conditions. Humans, rather than simply affecting or being
affected by the natural environment, are a central component in the
Earth system. Within the Earth system, there are feedbacks and tele-
connections that operate on a planetary scale, and in which humans are
directly involved.
Bridging the spatial and temporal scales of the different interacting
processes in the Earth system and putting together the many different
disciplines (from both natural and social sciences) is a huge challenge
for the scientific community.
For the global change research community, a further challenge is to
present research results in more accessible and informative ways to
stakeholders, particularly those concerned with sustainable develop-
ment. We are frequently expected to answer questions on
the effects of global change on regional and even local
scales. Stakeholders seek strategies to deal with future
environmental change, most often with a place-based
perspective. This is particularly important for the devel-
oping world, since the capacity to adapt to local or regional
changes driven by global factors is often limited.
The need to understand how the natural world works
has not diminished, but in fact underpins the answers to
questions of sustainable development. We must continue
to concentrate on first-class science involving the inter-
actions and feedbacks between biological, chemical and
physical processes and human systems. However, scien-
tists, resource managers and policy makers require a
common understanding in order for their interactions to
be mutually beneficial.
The kinds of questions now being asked of the research
community have changed over the last decades, and reflect
the increasing appreciation of the interconnectedness of
the Earth system. In the past, many scientific questions of
societal importance could be successfully addressed by
concentrating on either individual, or a small number of
the components of the Earth system, even though answer-
ing the questions still required international,
interdisciplinary collaboration. For instance, finding out
what caused the development of the Antarctic ozone hole
required international collaboration among atmospheric
chemists and meteorologists.
In contrast, the kinds of questions now being asked of
the scientific community show the increasing need for
a more holistic approach. Questions such as: can global
warming, urban-industrial emissions and land cover
changes influence the Asian Monsoon circulation? How
will changes in precipitation patterns caused by global
warming influence water management policies, on
regional and local scales? What will be the consequences
of large-scale land use and ecosystem changes caused
by moving towards biofuel production? What are the
impacts of the predicted climate changes on food
production and human security? What role does urban-
ization play in the health effects of air pollution? Do
megacities play a role in affecting the energy balance of
the planet and in the hydrological cycle? What form of
carbon sequestration scheme will have the smallest
negative impact on the earth system?
S
OCIETAL
B
ENEFIT
A
REAS
– E
COSYSTEMS