

[
] 213
R
isk
G
overnance
and
M
anagement
the increases in vulnerability of communities to natural
hazards. Climate change will add yet another stress to those
of environmental degradation and rapid unplanned urban
growth, further reducing communities’ abilities to cope with
even the existing levels of weather hazards.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) estimates that by 2100 the global average surface
air temperature will increase by 1.1 to 6.4ºC and the global
average sea level will rise between 18 and 59 centimetres.
7
It is very likely that heat waves and heavy precipitation
events will continue to become more frequent, and there
will be more precipitation at higher latitudes. It is likely that
tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become
more intense, and that precipitation will decrease in most
subtropical land areas.
It is impossible to be completely certain about the disaster-
related implications of these physical changes, for several
reasons. Firstly, there is considerable intrinsic uncertainty
in climate projections, especially for local scales of interest.
Secondly the occurrence of individual extreme events is very
random in character. Thirdly, the nature of societal exposure
and vulnerability to particular extreme conditions is both
diverse and rapidly changing. Nevertheless, decisions and
planning must go ahead, irrespective of these uncertainties.
IPCC provides extensive information on the impacts of
climate change and there is plenty of information on the
processes of historical disasters.
8
By extrapolating past expe-
rience to the conditions projected by IPCC – and in the
absence of measures to reduce disaster risks – the likely
consequences can be estimated in general terms as follows:
More heat waves
– will increase the number of deaths,
particularly among the elderly, the very young, or among
people who are chronically ill, socially isolated or otherwise
especially vulnerable.
Increased drought in some regions
– will likely lead to
land degradation, damage to crops or reduced yields, more
livestock deaths, and an increased risk of wildfire. Such
conditions will increase the risks for populations depend-
ent on subsistence agriculture, through food and water
shortage and higher incidence of malnutrition, water-borne
and food-borne diseases, and may lead to displacements of
populations.
Increased frequency of high precipitation in some regions
– will trigger floods and landslides, with potentially large
losses of life and assets. These events will disrupt agricul-
ture, settlements, commerce and transport and may further
increase pressures on urban and rural infrastructure.
Increases in the number and intensity of very strong cyclones
–will affect coastal regions, with potentially large additional
losses of lives and assets.
Sea-level rise, coupled with coastal storms
– will increase
the impacts of storm surge and river flooding and damage
livelihood systems and protective ecosystems. Low-lying
settlements may become unviable, which may result in
increased potential for movement of population and loss
of infrastructure.
Higher temperatures and melting glaciers
– may cause
glacial lake outbursts that could flood downstream
settlements.
The framework sets out five priorities for action:
• Ensure that disaster risk reduction is a national and local priority with
a strong institutional basis for implementation
• Identify, assess and monitor disaster risks and enhance early warning
• Use knowledge, innovation and education to build a culture of safety
and resilience at all levels
• Reduce the underlying risk factors (this covers the many environmen-
tal and societal factors that create or exacerbate the risks from natural
hazards)
• Strengthen disaster preparedness for effective response at all levels.
The expression ‘disaster risk reduction’, like that of ‘adaptation’, repre-
sents an abstract strategic and policy goal but tells little of what needs to
be done in practical terms to address these priorities.
5
Fortunately, there
is vast knowledge on what to do and many solutions and examples of
good practice are available.
In developed countries particularly, there are well-established secto-
ral risk reduction and risk management efforts, the success of which is
reflected in much lower death rates and lower relative economic losses.
A number of developing countries have also made excellent progress in
implementing policies that have cut loss of life especially.
Globally, the issue of disaster risk reduction is coordinated through the
United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR)
and the biennial sessions of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk
Reduction. This platformcomprises a broad selection of stakeholders in a
forum, which provides a strongmechanism for guiding worldwide action
to reduce disaster risks and to reverse the growing losses from disasters.
At the second session in June 2009, political leaders highlighted that
reducing disaster risk is critical to managing the impacts of climate
change and to avoiding an erosion of social and economic welfare.
6
While
there has been a dramatic increase in political will in all regions to address
disaster risk, and significant progress has been achieved since the Hyogo
Framework for Action was launched in 2005, it was agreed that greater
urgency and a major upscaling of effort is required to address the factors
that are driving the current increases in disaster risk.
Climate change and disaster risk
Climate change will affect disaster risks in two ways: firstly through
the increase in weather and climate extremes, and secondly through
Education is critical to providing the knowledge and tools that communities need
to manage their risks from weather events, climate change and other hazards
Image: Asian Disaster Reduction Center