Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  98 / 210 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 98 / 210 Next Page
Page Background

migration policies are designed to meet EU labour market short-

ages only, and tend to consider the individual migrant only

as a worker, in a utilitarian view. Changing their status from

temporary to long-term worker is surely not a straightforward

process. As a consequence, many workers who wish to stay in

the EU when their temporary contract expires are paradoxically

forced into being undocumented by the difficulties of changing

status. Moreover, while an increasing number of policies and

legislations are put forward in favour of temporary, circular and

seasonal workers and those who work in the health sector to fill

the labour market shortage, no specific policies are put in place

to prevent risks and protect families.

Finally, while migration is increasingly demonstrating to be

a family business, policymakers still shape migration policies

around the individual alone. Whether this is through choice

or a lack of understanding of today’s society, there is an urgent

need to invert this tendency. For these reasons COFACE is

working to raise awareness of the difficulties that transnational

families specifically go through and advocating towards the EU

institutions for migration policies that consider migrants’ fami-

lies not as a burden but as part of the process. The number of

transnational families is growing and will not stop, even if we

keep ignoring their existence. The future of these families, and

of the people who belong to them, is in the hands of today’s

leaders and we cannot risk the future of these people because

we choose to turn a blind eye. We need to look at today’s world

and society, remembering that the world economy is not made

of numbers but of people.

Public attitude to migrants

Unsuccessful integration may be the result of ‘unwelcoming’ attitudes

to immigrants, which may in turn be reinforced by the social problems

linked to their poor integration. This situation may make it politically

unacceptable to receive more immigrants. Eurobarometer survey

results indicate that, on average, only 40 per cent of EU citizens feel

that immigrants contribute a lot to their country, while a majority of

citizens (52 per cent) do not agree with this statement. However,

there are significant differences across countries. While 79 per cent

of Swedes and two-thirds of Portuguese have a positive opinion of

immigrants’ contribution to society, only 12 per cent of Slovaks hold this

view. In general, citizens in the old member states are more positive

about migrants’ contribution than those in the new member states.

Immigrants with jobs are more closely bonded to their host

society. Equally, employed migrants contribute to a positive public

image of immigrants (i.e. as hard-working, rather than as a drain

on public resources). However, in a recent Eurobarometer survey

on discrimination in the EU, most EU citizens acknowledged that

foreigners would stand less chance of getting a job or traineeship,

even with the same level of qualifications as other candidates. On

average in the EU, 58 per cent of people thought that foreigners

would be less likely to be successful compared with native born

workers of the country. Countries with the highest shares of

respondents expecting foreigners would be less likely were Belgium,

Finland, France, the Netherlands and Sweden, all with rates over

70 per cent. As shown earlier, these are among the member states

with the largest gaps in employment rates between migrants and the

EU-born. Discrimination not only hinders labour market performance

of immigrants, but by decreasing returns to human capital lowers their

incentive to invest in host-country-specific human capital, which in

turn results in lower labour market performance.

– Employment in Europe Report 2008, European Commission

Mobile phones and the Internet are important communication tools, but they depend on a good communication infrastructure and knowledge of how to use such devices

Image: Stylianos Papardelas /www.stylianospapardelas.com

[

] 96

C

onfronting

F

amily

P

overty