Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  104 / 210 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 210 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 102

C

onfronting

F

amily

P

overty

sector, either those who are self-employed or those in other

informal enterprises.

While there is some heterogeneity in the group of women

who are self-employed, women in this group tend to be of

low socioeconomic status with few options to access child-

care services outside their family network. For women who

do not have family support to meet their childcare needs, the

opportunity cost of continuing to work may be high enough

to induce them to stop working for pay, which adversely

affects household income. Therefore, by creating differenti-

ated opportunities for women to be integrated into the labour

market, the supply of and/or unequal access to childcare

options reinforce social and economic inequalities.

Moreover, unequal access to childcare and early educa-

tion can also perpetuate socioeconomic inequality in future

generations. From this perspective, childcare not only

facilitates insertion into the labour market or enhances

reconciliation of family and work responsibilities for low-

income women, it also affects the future performance of

their children. Extensive evidence shows that early stimu-

lation and education have positive and lasting social and

economic impacts and are associated with better educa-

tional attainment, lower levels of teenage pregnancy and

lower involvement in risky activities.

Outside the family, the supply of childcare services in the

region comes from a poorly articulated combination of public,

private and community initiatives. Usually public initiatives are

managed fromministries or institutes relating to the family and

social development, or in some cases the Ministry of Education.

Instead of providing the services directly, the state also encour-

ages the development of childcare services through grants to

non-state institutions, including private for-profit providers

and non-profit religious and community organizations.

There is a high degree of heterogeneity in net attendance

rates to early education or childcare services in Latin America.

According to ECLAC, the net attendance rate for children

between birth and three years old ranges from 5 per cent

(Guatemala, Honduras, Dominican Republic and Paraguay) to

20 per cent (Cuba and México). For children aged three to six

it is considerably higher, but only in Cuba and Mexico does it

approach universal coverage; in Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina,

Peru, Colombia and Panama net attendance rate for children

aged three to six is between 60 and 75 per cent.

In recent years several countries in the region have

expanded infrastructure and increased availability of early

childhood education and care services. In Mexico, preschool

education and childcare is provided by the Mexican Social

Security Institute (directed at employees in the formal

economy) and, starting in 2007, a system of services promul-

gated by the Secretariat of Social Development (SEDESOL),

aimed specifically at low-income working mothers who do

not have access to social security benefits. The SEDESOL

programme seeks to facilitate the incorporation of these

women to the labour market and at the same time create

jobs. The model subsidizes both the supply and demand

of childcare services. Money is transferred to individu-

als, in most cases women or social organizations, to adapt

their spaces into childcare centres and subsidies are paid

to families for every child who uses these services, cover-

ing 35 per cent of the cost of the childcare. To enrol their

children and receive the state subsidy, parents must meet

certain requirements, including that the mother be working,

looking for work or studying, household income require-

ments, and that the household should not have access to

childcare provided by the Mexican Social Security Institute.

To qualify for the subsidy, the service provider does not need

0

20

40

60

80

100

Two-parent extended

Without children

Single-parent extended

Two-parent nuclear

Single-person

Single-parent nuclear

Blended

Per cent

1990

2

59

9

15

7

4

4

Quintile I

Quintile V

2010

5

51

13

5

14

8

4

1990

13

45

9

14

10

3

6

2010

22

33

11

17

7

4

6

Latin America (18 countries): composition of first and fifth income quintile according to family type, 1990 and 2010

Source: ECLAC, on the basis of tabulations of household surveys in the region