[
] 108
Social development programmes
for family well-being in Kenya
Stefanie O. Bitengo, Principal Gender and Social Development Officer, Department of Social Development,
Ministry of Labour, Social Security and Services, Kenya
C
onfronting
F
amily
P
overty
P
overty, ignorance and disease have remained Kenya’s
priority areas of intervention since independence in
1963. As the country marks its fiftieth anniversary,
considerable progress has been made in mitigating these
challenges. However, chronic poverty incidences remain
high and persistent among an estimated 46 per cent of
the population. In an increasingly unequal society, access
to basic needs such as education, health, clean water,
adequate housing and sanitation are still unreachable to the
bottom 30 per cent of the population who only have access
to 10 per cent of the national income. The main determi-
nants of poverty in Kenya include geographical (rural or
urban) location, the gender and education level of the head
of household, high unemployment and underemployment.
Kenya, like many African countries, is home tomany peoples and
nationalities who embrace diverse cultural orientations. Despite
these, the family remains a common unit which enjoys recog-
nition and the protection of the state.
1
In the African context,
the traditional family referred to a larger kin group beyond the
nuclear family of father, mother and children. It embraced an
extended network which often served as a source of security
and livelihood for its members. The traditional extended African
family provided the required social capital: if one of its members
had a source of livelihood, then it was assumed that the family’s
well-being was catered for. With the family structure irreversibly
changing from this extended model to more nuclear forms, liveli-
hoods at family level have deteriorated.
The effects of social change and the resulting breakdown in
the traditional extended family support network have exposed
the family to varied problems, leaving its members vulnerable
and in need of social protection and support. As a result, the
family now bears the greatest burden of poverty and vulnerabil-
ity; a situation that calls for multi-pronged and concerted efforts
from all stakeholders to realize enhanced family well-being.
Since independence, the Social Development Department
within the public sector has been instrumental in coordinating
policies, programmes and activities focused on improving family
well-being. Interventions targeting family well-being have been
numerous, and cut across various government ministries.
Until now, the department has existed under different port-
folios. Since 1922, department functions have evolved through
a series of colonial and post-independence policy frameworks,
sessional papers, national and community development plans,
circulars and, more recently, the Constitution of Kenya 2010.
It has made significant strides in the country’s social devel-
opment, transforming from social welfare to community
development in the 1950s and leading to the creation of Kenya’s
first Community Development Ministry in 1954, with func-
tions that included adult education, approved schools, juvenile
remand homes, rural betterment schemes, youth sports, music,
women’s clubs and recreational activities. The overall objec-
tive of the department has remained focused on mobilizing and
building the capacity of individuals, communities and commu-
nity groups to attain self-reliance. This objective contributes
both directly and indirectly towards family well-being.
Several interventions have been prioritized under social
development, including community mobilization and
development programmes; social welfare programmes and
services to vulnerable populations; gender and women’s
empowerment, as well as the development of policies aimed
at providing overall direction on matters of gender and social
development. Social development policies in community
development, older persons and persons with disabilities
(PWDs) have continued to provide frameworks for Kenya’s
legal and programmatic interventions on addressing the
poverty of the most vulnerable families.
Under the community mobilization and development func-
tion, the department has spearheaded a successful self-help
movement. It has cumulatively facilitated the mobilization
and registration of over 1 million community groups with an
estimated membership of over 20 million individuals, partici-
pating in socioeconomic activities that include interventions
in education, health, agriculture, water and financial services.
These interventions are strengthened by the concept that the
potential for poverty alleviation at household level lies in the
ability of members to participate effectively in development
processes and interventions at the community level.
Studies have shown that poor people are often left out
of development initiatives either because they are not
able to meet requirements for participation, or they lack
the confidence and self-esteem to be part of development
ventures. This curtails their opportunities to benefit from the
development intervention and denies them an opening for
building capacity for future participation, thus keeping them
in poverty from one generation to the next. Efforts by the
department to promote community mobilization and group
formation, and build the capacity development of group
members, were seen as a way of providing the poor with
an opportunity to pool their resources and build the ability




