Previous Page  106 / 168 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 106 / 168 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 106

The Philippines

Prior to 2010, Philippines legislation treated disasters as inevi-

table and was primarily focused on emergency relief, which was

heavily centralized. Therefore very little action was taken by the

Government to reduce the risk of disasters or prepare communi-

ties for an impending hazard. As a result, many people died or

lost valuable assets in the immediate aftermath of a disaster.

In the event of a disaster, the Philippines President would declare

a State of Calamity. As government funds for relief efforts could only

be mobilized 24 hours after this declaration, vulnerable people had

to wait for a disaster to occur before they could get any help.

In 2007, Christian Aid partners engaged government agencies

in formulating the Strategic National Action Plan (SNAP) as the

country’s commitment to DRR; this plan was based on the HFA.

SNAP was a roadmap detailing where the Philippines wanted to

be in ten years’ time. It had a clear direction and set indicators

to measure progress. It was presented to congress as a proposal

for DRR policy.

The DRR Network of the Philippines (DRRNet) – a network

of over 300 actors – was convened in 2008 to advocate for

more national and local commitment to DRR and for law

reforms. Christian Aid partners were instrumental in

convening DRRNet, which includes members from

international and local CSOs, communities, practi-

tioners, academics and government agencies. The

Ateneo School of Government provided key support

by acting as the secretariat and providing a legal

adviser to the network.

The network reached a shared position on reform

and identified key non-negotiables such as:

• the mandatory participation of CSOs in national

and local DRR policymaking

• civil society being recognized as key actors in

supporting the implementation of the law

• a focus on people and community-centred DRR

• decentralization of DRR so that local government,

communities and CSOs could have more respon-

sibility and resources for DRR in their areas.

DRRNet targeted key DRR champions in the Senate to

advocate for these non-negotiables to be incorporated

into the drafts of the new law.

Representative Rozzano Rufino Biazon (left) and Teofisto Guingona III (centre), DRR champions and principal authors of the DRRM Bill in the House of

Representatives, together with DRRNetPhils’ Sharon Taylor (right) participate in the first Bicameral Conference Committee Meeting on the DRRM Bill

held in January 2010 at the Philippine Senate

Image: Allan Vera