Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  36 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 34

What can be done?

Although science and technology cannot prevent disas-

ters from occurring, recent experiences and successes

offer real hope for reducing disaster impacts. This is

predominantly achieved by using the latest science and

technology in a) increasing the timing and accuracy of

disaster warning, b) applying Risk and Vulnerability

Analysis (RVA) techniques for better planning and miti-

gation, and c) building capacities and partnerships to

proactively take advantage of advances in disaster risk

reduction. Simply put, if disasters are defined as the

intersection of phenomena and presence, science and

technology can now help to limit the overlap of the prin-

cipal components, reducing the risks and impacts.

Reducing disaster risks is a multi-dimensional

problem requiring a multi-dimensional solution; science

and technology alone cannot achieve the ultimate

results. The work of culturally sensitive institutions in

raising awareness at the community level is also impor-

tant, approaching the problem from bottom-up.

How can science and technology reduce risks? First, by

improving the timeliness and accuracy of disaster warnings,

and improving the speed and clarity of alerts disseminated

of their citizens is often linked to natural environments or cultivated

lands that are also destroyed or altered.

Industrialized nations, where the dollar-values associated with

losses can be staggeringly high, struggle with the costs of disasters.

Developing nations, where the value of the loss is lower because

there is less to lose, often pay for their shortcomings in terms of

greater loss of life and more extreme economic setback.

Regardless of any comparisons in raw dollar amounts, natural

disasters cost developing countries from six per cent to fifteen per

cent of gross domestic product (GDP), on average. Progress is being

made on this front. Cyclone Val cost 230 per cent of Samoa GDP in

1991; Cyclone Heta cost only nine per cent of GDP in 2004.

With human lives and livelihoods at stake, every measure capable

of reducing risk and mitigating the impact of natural and human-

induced disasters must be used to the fullest. This includes

incorporating what is known of potential disasters in the planning

of development and infrastructure, and taking steps today to lessen

the effects of future disasters.

Not if, but when a disaster occurs, it is vital to have the appropri-

ate science and technology in place to support complete, concise,

accurate and actionable communication within agencies, between

organizations and right down to the last mile of early warning to

those potentially affected.

ASEAN countries regional natural disaster risk overview

Data streams from sensors, satellites, buoys and other sources can be time-consuming and challenging.

Visualized data, like the risks to ASEAN nations pictured here, can be immediately understandable

Source: Shaded Relief, © WorldSat International Inc. 2001, Digital Chart of the World, NOAA/NGDC, UNISYS Weather, ORNL LandScan 2001