

[
] 62
An operational geospatial IT solution spanning multiple
data sources and disciplines, such as GEOSS, is needed to
bridge the ‘isolated’ interoperability building blocks of
Sensor Web, discovery and exploitation services. Thus,
GEOSS will be key to the successful path of the Sensor
Web and vice versa. GEOSS depends on a powerful sensor
data infrastructure to obtain its major tasks, while provid-
ing several key components necessary to make the Sensor
Web fully operational. The GEOSSWeb portal implements
a single point of entry either directly to the Sensor Web
services and products, or via its linked community portals.
In conjunction with the GEOSS clearinghouse, the GEOSS
registry and community catalogue services, Sensor Web
components will be explored for reuse in new applications
built on top of the existing Sensor Web infrastructure. The
following example illustrates how GEOSS empowers the
set-up of new applications based on sensor data and made
available by Sensor Web components.
The Advanced Fire Information System (AFIS) version
two, is one of the early examples of a GEOSS application
based on Sensor Web technology. Currently in an experi-
mental phase, it integrates a growing number of data
sources and sensor tasking components. Once completed,
AFIS will be the ideal example of an application that makes
use of a number of systems that were united in the GEOSS.
AFIS analyses veld fires in sub-Saharan Africa.
Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer satellite
data from Aqua and Terra satellites is continuously parsed
for hot pixels, which indicate potential veld fires. This
hotspot data is provided by a sensor observation service
instance located in South Africa. Hotspots located close
to power lines, commercial forestations or urban areas
trigger NASA’s EO1 satellite automatically. The tasking
uses a sensor planning service to upload the observation
requests to the satellite. The Hyerperion and ALI sensors
onboard EO1 produce vast amounts of data that is down-
linked and further processed in the US, before it is sent to
a data store located in Canada. This data store is façaded
by a Web coverage service interface. Standardized by the
OGC, the Web coverage service allows clients compliant
to the standard to retrieve the data automatically.
The client application integrates additional data sets
provided by sensor observation services, including current
wind situation and topographical data sets, to calculate
the spread of the fires. The client application sends alerts
via the Web notification service in case the fires threaten
valuable areas. All AFIS components can be explored in
the GEOSS clearinghouse. Component interfaces are regis-
tered at the GEOSS registry. Since each is fully standards
compliant, it can be used within other applications.
The Sensor Web, as a new Earth observation system,
opens up a new avenue to fast assimilation of data from
various sensors (both in situ and remote), as well as to
accurate analysis and informed decision making. It
provides the foundation layer for GEOSS, in the form
of raw and processed sensor data that is the basis for the
higher level information in Earth observations essential
to understanding the current and future situation of
planet.
Sensor Web is a meta-platform that integrates arbitrary sensors and
sensor networks, each maintained and operated by individual institu-
tions. Examples include the Australian Water Resources Network, the
European Environment Information and Observation Network, and
the South African Earth Observation Network. This reflects the exist-
ing legal, organizational and technical situation. Sensors and sensor
systems are operated by various organizations with varying access
constraints, as well as security, data quality and performance require-
ments. The architecture of the Sensor Web allows the integration of
individual sensors and of complete sensor systems without the need
for fundamental changes to the legacy systems.
Once connected to the Sensor Web, data sets may be used multiple
times in applications never intended by the original system set-up.
Traffic sensors initially deployed to avoid traffic jams by means of
dynamic traffic control might be used to calculate the carbon dioxide
ratios of highway sections in another application. Satellites with differ-
ent sensors on board might be used in a variety of application domains
that were not primarily targeted, simply because the interoperable inter-
faces allow users to task the satellite based on distinct requirements.
Consumers use the Internet to access distributed data sources by
invoking Web services. The Web services interfaces must be standard-
ized to achieve interoperability between all data, or sensor providers
and consumers. Currently, the most prominent approach to standard-
izing Sensor Web interfaces is the Sensor Web Enablement Initiative
run by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), a not-for-profit, inter-
national, voluntary consensus standards organization that leads the
development of standards for geospatial and location-based services.
The consortium unites more than 350 software vendors, research
institutes and government agencies worldwide. In the context of the
Sensor Web Enablement Initiative, a number of standards have been
developed during the past seven years to provide a sound technologi-
cal foundation on which to build the Sensor Web. The standards cover
a number of requirements. First, sensors and sensor data have to be
discoverable. Queries based on observed phenomena, temporal reso-
lution, spatial extent, and quality levels, among other criteria, allow
the filtering of the vast amounts of available data sources. The infor-
mation obtained has to be understandable and processable by machines.
This requires a high level of syntactical and semantic expressiveness.
Sensors will be tasked to the specific needs of various user groups and
will send alerts when a sensor measures a particular phenomenon.
Overall, the OGC has published seven standards: four Web service
interface specifications and three data encoding and metadata
languages. The sensor observation service retrieves sensor data, the
sensor planning service tasks sensors and models, the sensor alert
service pushes real-time information to the registered user, and the Web
notification service delivers sensor information by means of various
communication protocols. The sensor model language describes
sensors, platforms and sensor data processing chains. Abstract models
and XML-based implementations to encode sensor data are provided
by the observation and measurement. The transducer mark-up language
supports description and encoding of continuous data streams.
Although technical solutions for building the Sensor Web are avail-
able, there is a lack of consolidated effort to make all data sets
discoverable and accessible. This is mainly due to the fact that the
Sensor Web specifications enable access to sensors and observation
data, but do not provide any catalogues, dictionaries or registries that
facilitate discovery and exploitation. This was done intentionally. Other
internationally adopted standards, provided by the International
Organization for Standardization and the OGC, cover this field.
GEOSS C
OMPONENTS
– O
BSERVING
S
YSTEMS