Previous Page  32 / 168 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 168 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 32

Management Act 2002; the Resource Management Act;

the Building Act 2004 and the Local Government Act

2002.

5,6,7,8

These, and other legislation, underpin a wide

range of national strategies, plans, policies, regulatory

codes and practices supporting risk reduction at central

and local government levels. Specific examples include

the Building Code and compliance regime (with its

emphasis on earthquake and storm resistance), resource

consent processes, and the New Zealand Coastal Policy

Statement.

Government agencies also contribute to disaster risk

reduction outcomes through the services they deliver

locally on a daily basis, including providing social

welfare, education and health services that aim to build

capability and lessen individuals’ and communities

vulnerability to disaster risks.

In recognition of the critical role that network ‘life-

line’ utilities (water, energy, telecommunications,

transport etc.) play in supporting economic activity

and social wellbeing, and the strong dependence of

community disaster resilience on infrastructure, the

CDEM Act 2002 requires network providers to ‘func-

tion to the fullest possible extent’ in a disaster. Network

providers are therefore strongly encouraged to under-

take their own business continuity management, and

to work collaboratively at a national and local level to

reduce disaster risk.

9

Another important contribution of central

Government to risk reduction is through establish-

ing priorities and funding national research into

hazards, risks, vulnerabilities and disaster resilience, to

on the management options suited to their specific situations, for

example through land-use planning and building control activi-

ties. The ‘bottom-up’ approach aims to build a resilient and safer

New Zealand with communities understanding and managing their

hazards and risks.

3

Central to DRR at the local level are Civil Defence Emergency

Management (CDEM) Groups.

4

These are consortia of local authori-

ties based on regional council boundaries, working in partnership

with emergency services (police, fire, health), infrastructure provid-

ers, science providers, government departments, non-governmental

organisations, and others.

Sixteen of these groups across New Zealand are primarily

responsible for assessing and managing local risks, consulting and

communicating about risk management with their communities,

developing and implementing plans, managing the consequences of

emergencies in their area, and assisting other groups in planning and

response. Funding for local risk reduction, readiness, response, and

recovery activities comes from a local property-based rating system.

Central Government funding (from general income tax) is limited

and aims to provide the minimum level of assistance required to

restore community capacity for self-help and to support develop-

ment of sustainable solutions.

Disaster risk reduction: national

New Zealand risk reduction policies, programmes and services

across central government aim to support local government, busi-

nesses and individuals to reduce risk at the community and personal

level. One of the key ways it achieves this is developing and admin-

istering a broad framework of legislation that underpins sustainable

hazard risk management and resource planning. Key legislation that

addresses hazard risk reduction includes the Civil Defence Emergency

Ground shaking in the 22 February 2011 event was the largest ever recorded for a New Zealand earthquake and resulted in significant damage to buildings

Image: Anita Komen