Previous Page  40 / 168 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 168 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 40

management have been finding it difficult to coor-

dinate with theses agencies for conducting studies

or facilitating the SDMC in such studies. Visits to

field locations, accessing of reports and documents

and meetings with concerned authorities have been

beset with multiple challenges that have hindered the

process of trans-boundary risk assessments. SDMC

finds it extremely difficult to network with such a

complex web of institutions.

Lack of trained manpower and adequate financial

resources within the regional organizations have

further constrained the recording of trans-boundary

risk assessment. The SAARC Disaster Management

Centre does not always have in-house professionals

to conduct such studies and outsourcing has not been

easy as requisite financial resources are not always

available for funding them.

Despite these challenges, the regional cooperation

on disaster management in South Asia has not been

insignificant considering the fact that the process of

such cooperation started less than five years ago. In

this context, reference may be made to three interest-

ing initiatives of regional cooperation in the recent past.

First is the South Asia Disaster Knowledge Network

(SADKN), which is one of the flagship projects of the

SAARC Disaster Management Centre. It is a virtual

network involving eight member countries of SAARC

and hundreds of organizations and institutions within,

and outside, the governments in the region that are

Constraints of resources have been another limiting factor in the

implementation of the agreed framework and road maps. SAARC

has been hidebound in receiving assistance from external sources.

Almost all the initiatives of SAARC have been funded by contribu-

tions from the Member States, as per the sharing formula worked

out on the basis of the size and the population of respective state.

Reluctance persists among members to enhance their contributions,

which constrains the implementation of regional projects.

Member states have also been reluctant to share critical data on

transborder hazards and vulnerabilities, particularly on issues like

discharge and withdrawal of water from rivers and reservoirs and

rainfall in upper catchment which are necessary for developing

regional flood early warning systems.

South Asia is an extremely data scarce region. The observational

networks for collection of hazard data are low, with the result that

comprehensive data on natural hazards at a micro level are scarce.

Secondly, real time transmission of data is mostly non-existent.

Historical and time series data on hazards, vulnerabilities and risks

are scattered in multiple agencies and very little effort has been made

to digitize the data. The Member States and their specialized agen-

cies have also been very conservative in sharing data with outside

agencies including the regional organizations. For example, micro

level seismic and hydrological data are invariably not shared which

makes it extremely difficult to conduct detailed trans-boundary risk

assessments of floods, earthquakes and landslides.

A number of different scientific, technical and research organiza-

tions are involved with risk assessments. These in turn are under

the administrative control of different ministries and authorities

of the member states. Even the national focal points on disaster

Community and population vulnerability of Hutbay, Andaman due to 2004 Sumatra – Andaman tsunamis

Image: Mishra et al., 2005