Previous Page  140 / 287 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 140 / 287 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 141

O

bserving

, P

redicting

and

P

rojecting

C

limate

C

onditions

often have a difficult time convincing policy-makers of

the climate change impacts they observe in the field.

11

The

IPCC, in its fourth assessment report, concluded with ‘very

high confidence’

12

that climate change is already affecting

living systems.

The Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group (AHTEG) on

biodiversity and climate change was convened in response

to a decision from the Conference of the Parties to the

Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). AHTEG was

established to provide biodiversity related information to

the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate

Change (UNFCCC) through the provision of scientific and

technical advice on the integration of the conservation and

sustainable use of biodiversity into climate change mitiga-

tion and adaptation activities. One of the tasks of the group

was to identify relevant tools and methodologies for assess-

ing the impacts on, and vulnerabilities of, biodiversity as a

result of climate change. Results fromAHTEG revealed that

key uncertainties limit our ability to project climate change

impacts on ecosystems, but that despite their limitations,

bioclimatic models provide a useful first assessment of the

vulnerability of biodiversity.

Identifying climate data needs within the biodiversity

community

There are a number of research needs and gaps with regards

to assessing the impacts of climate change on biodiversity.

Some of these have been filled, but many remain. For

example, there is still a lack of extensive, readily avail-

able quantitative information on many species globally.

13

A review of relevant literature conducted in 2006 revealed

a continuing terrestrial bias and identified additional gaps

with regards to geographic distribution.

14

In particular,

validation of suchmodels, and also demonstrated that uncertainty can be

reduced by selecting the most consensual projections. This method can

provide good range projections of species for the purposes of conserva-

tion planning and biodiversity management.

7

Due to the complexity of natural systems, predictive errors are inevi-

table. However, for certain species and at certain scales, the bioclimatic

envelope approach can provide a first approximation of the potential

impact of climate change on species distributions. Nevertheless, biocli-

matic models should only be applied and interpreted with a thorough

understanding of the limitations involved. In particular, it should be

noted that these models assume no barriers to movement which, in the

case of highly fragmented ecosystems, may deliver a significant under-

estimation of the scale and scope of climate change impacts.

Change in biome

8

area simulated by coupled Global Circulation

Models and Global Vegetation Models may be used to estimate

changes in species richness, if the assumption is made that the biome’s

climatic definition is to be used as a proxy for the climatic envelope

of multiple resident species.

9

These types of models may not be well

suited to estimate changes in biodiversity, since they usually assume

that ecosystems or biomes simply shift location while maintaining

their current composition and structure.

10

Policies related to the conservation of biodiversity and climate change

need to be informed by the best possible recent scientific findings.

However, these findings depend on the accuracy of modelling techniques

and confidence in projections of future climate change and its impacts.

Policy formulation and decision making is therefore often based on a

certain degree of scientific uncertainty. It is important that policy makers

are well informed of this uncertainty.

For IPCC experts, assessing the extent to which recent observed

changes in biodiversity were caused by climate change was a very diffi-

cult task. These difficulties were partly due to the differences in approach

between biologists and other disciplines, and in perspectives of what

constitutes an important factor of change. Moreover, field biologists

Mendenhall Glacier: the melting of glaciers is accelerating rapidly in Alaska. Animals

that dwell on or near glaciers may be affected by the disappearance of their habitats

Kea, an alpine parrot endemic to New Zealand’s alpine areas. The

Kea is considered an endangered species. Potential threats for this

species include the effects of climate change on alpine areas

Image: Toan Cung

Image: Camellia Ibrahim