Previous Page  185 / 218 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 185 / 218 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 183

funding agencies require an economic assessment of the net

benefit of such a programme, often in the form of a benefit-

cost analysis. Although quantifying costs can be relatively

straightforward, estimating benefits from NMHS can be more

difficult because those receiving the benefits are usually not

the NMHS but rather a wide variety of economic and societal

sectors.

Guide research investment

– Similar to benefit-cost analysis,

assessments should be made when agencies decide what

research to undertake in order to improve or maintain weather

services. Identifying likely outcomes of alternative investments

and quantifying benefits and costs helps to guide choices

between research investments. Even if rigorous analysis is not

possible because of uncertainties or lack of economic infor-

mation, framing the problem in terms of benefits and costs can

help decision makers identify which projects to undertake and

which ones to put aside.

Inform users about benefits

– Understanding the use and

benefits of forecasts is also important for informing potential

users about how and why they could use weather information.

Demonstrating value to the users goes a long way towards

gaining their involvement and support.

Develop end-to-end-to-end systems

– Ultimately, the best use

of economic information will combine all these approaches

into integrated end-to-end-to-end forecast and warning

systems. In such systems the preferences, needs and values of

users will guide decision making throughout the system in

terms of what types of information to provide and how to

disseminate it, along with what research to undertake and what

programmes to support.

Ultimately, value accrues from the behaviour of users and the

impacts of their decisions.

It is clear that there is no simple answer to the question:

‘what is the value of a forecast?’ Equally complex is the ques-

tion of where resources would be best allocated to improve the

societal benefits of NMHS. If current levels of forecast infor-

mation are underused, for example, it may be best to invest

more in communication and decision making.

Because economists have a wide range of tools and

approaches for valuing the benefits and costs of goods and

services, including those provided by NMHS, there is no need

to invent new methods for valuing weather forecasts. The basic

approaches for valuing weather forecasts are discussed in Lazo,

Teisburg, and Weiher in this volume. Accepted theories and

methods pertinent to issues in valuing weather information

services include:

• Estimating benefits of services that are not actually bought

and sold in competitive economic markets (this includes

most weather forecasts)

• Valuing benefits and costs that occur over a range of time

periods

• Valuing the impacts of weather and forecasts on lives saved

or lost

• Valuing information about uncertain future events (which

is the fundamental value of weather forecasts).

It is important to note that, just as economists should not be

forecasting the weather, the meteorological community would

do well to work with economists to bring the appropriate theo-

ries, methods and tools to the economic analysis of weather

impacts and forecasts.

Assessing the economic benefits

of NMHS and their services

There is a variety of reasons for assessing the economic value

of NMHS products and services. It is important to understand

why economic valuation is of interest as this effects the type

of values assessed, the accuracy needed in assessing these

values, and how information about these values is commu-

nicated.

Justify programmes

– Showing the net positive economic

benefits of NMHS is becoming more critical as these services

do battle to justify their budgets. Data on the economic value

of such services can carry significant weight for policy decision

making and budget setting – even recognizing that many polit-

ical decisions are made irrespective of economic trade-offs.

Evaluate programmes

–When determining whether to invest

in a specific program, many local, national, and international

Source: Jeffrey K. Lazo

Weather

Weather forecast

enterprise

Communication

Users and

decision making

Impacts and values

Weather forecast and impact value chain

Weather impacts such as the loss of crops can be mitigated through

protective action in response to weather forecasts