Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  117 / 210 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 117 / 210 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 115

M

ā

ori wh

ā

nau well-being:

addressing child and family poverty

Tracey McIntosh, PhD (T

ū

hoe), Associate Professor in Sociology, University of Auckland;

and Ng

ā

Pae o te M

ā

ramatanga, Indigenous Centre of Research Excellence, New Zealand

C

onfronting

F

amily

P

overty

M

ā

ori (indigenous people of New Zealand) wh

ā

nau

are diverse and dynamic and are the central unit

of M

ā

ori life. While ‘wh

ā

nau’ is usually trans-

lated simply as ‘family’ or ‘extended family’, it is important

to recognize that the term has multiple dimensions. Within

both traditional and contemporary contexts it is seen as

being based on whakapapa (foundations based on descent

and kinship). Whakapapa identifies, acknowledges and

reinforces relationships and informs the way that M

ā

ori

engage and respond to each other. Wh

ā

nau sits within

the structures of hap

ū

(clan, sub-tribe) and iwi (tribe),

and each has the potential to support individuals and the

collective with a reach that can span generations.

It has been noted that a narrow appreciation of family compo-

sition renders invisible the diversity of wh

ā

nau structure and

the richness and depth of family practices and strategies to

cope with contemporary challenges. A recent New Zealand

Families Commission report indicates that, like other New

Zealand families, M

ā

ori wh

ā

nau are changing in response to

shifts in demographic, social and economic patterns. Wh

ā

nau

composition includes two-parent families, single-parent

families, adult-only families and multigenerational families.

Increasingly, M

ā

ori live in urban centres outside of their

traditional tribal area and some M

ā

ori wh

ā

nau live overseas,

particularly in Australia. Statistics New Zealand data shows

that 85 per cent of M

ā

ori live in statistically defined urban

areas, though many of these areas have relatively small popu-

lations. This means that the M

ā

ori urban experience can be

diverse with more M

ā

ori likely to live in minor urban areas

(rather than large cities) than the national distribution. They

are less likely to live in main urban areas where essential

services and jobs are concentrated. The diasporic nature of

contemporary M

ā

ori experience shapes the way that wh

ā

nau

is lived in contemporary New Zealand.

The 2012 Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Advisory

Group on Solutions to Child Poverty report clearly indicates

that the children and families living in poverty in New Zealand

come from a range of ethnic and cultural backgrounds. The

report notes that as many as 25 per cent of New Zealand

children (around 270,000) are currently living in poverty.

However, it also notes that the child poverty rates of M

ā

ori

(and children of Pacific Island descent) are approximately

double that of white New Zealand children, and that M

ā

ori are

much more likely to experience the effects of severe poverty

and have a greater risk of this poverty enduring across their

life course. While child and family poverty is not simply a

M

ā

ori issue in New Zealand, if it is to be reduced the solutions

will need to work for M

ā

ori.

In thinking about the contemporary experience of M

ā

ori

wh

ā

nau, and particularly the interface with poverty, it is

important to recognize the impact of colonization. There is

a tendency to think that the alienation of land has largely

been experienced as a spiritual loss by M

ā

ori because indig-

enous peoples are often represented as having a heightened

attachment to the land. While land and place play an inte-

gral part in M

ā

ori histories, cultural narratives and identity,

they have also had a vital economic role. Thus, the alienation

of land and resources is not only the loss of a cultural and

spiritual base, but also the loss of an economic base. While

there is an extensive body of scholarly literature in this area,

this is reinforced in a recent research report published by

the Families Commission documenting the experiences of

M

ā

ori wh

ā

nau living in financial hardship. It notes that any

analysis of the financial and material deprivation of wh

ā

nau

Children not living in poverty

Children living in a household which receives less than 60 per cent

of the median disposable household income (after housing costs)

270,000 children

25% of population

75%

New Zealand children in poverty

Source: Daniel Patrick, Ng

ā

Pae o te M

ā

ramatanga