Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  50 / 210 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 210 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 48

Wh

ā

nau Ora: strengthening M

ā

ori families

in Aotearoa, New Zealand

Emeritus Professor Sir Mason Durie, Massey University; and Ng

ā

Pae o te M

ā

ramatanga,

Indigenous Centre of Research Excellence, New Zealand

A

dvancing

S

ocial

I

ntegration

and

I

ntergenerational

S

olidarity

M

ā

ori are the indigenous people of Aotearoa

New Zealand. Like indigenous populations

who have been colonized in other parts of the

world, the M

ā

ori suffered serious depopulation in the

latter half of the nineteenth century as a consequence

of infectious diseases, musket wars, land losses and

malnutrition. By 1910, however, and largely due to

inspirational indigenous leadership at political, medical

and community levels, a recovery process was evident.

More than a century later, the 2013 New Zealand Census

of Individuals and Dwellings showed that the population

had increased from around 47,000 in 1910 to 598,605, now

accounting for 14 per cent of the total New Zealand popula-

tion. Although slowly ageing, M

ā

ori are relatively youthful,

the median age being 24 years compared to 38 years for the

total population. In that respect the population is larger

than it ever has been in the past, with greater rates of

participation in a range of professions and industries. There

are also positive signs of greater participation in tertiary

education. According to the New Zealand Government

Statistician, over 36,000 M

ā

ori stated a bachelor’s degree

or higher as their highest qualification at the 2013 Census

– a more than 50 per cent increase since 2006.

Meanwhile, in the face of alarming disparities between

M

ā

ori and non-M

ā

ori first detailed in 1960, significant

changes to M

ā

ori policy were introduced in 1984. The

changes partially reflected the New Zealand Government’s

recognition of the1840 Treaty of Waitangi, under which the

British Crown made certain guarantees to M

ā

ori including

recognition of M

ā

ori property rights and expectations of

similar citizenship rights and social well-being. The 1984

approach also recognized the right of M

ā

ori to retain their

language and culture and to enjoy state-supported M

ā

ori

television and radio networks. Importantly, the new mood

saw the emergence of M

ā

ori health and social service provid-

ers, M

ā

ori language-medium schools, and the introduction

of M

ā

ori perspectives into the core business of hospitals,

schools, prisons, universities and government departments.

However, notwithstanding major gains over the previous

three decades, most socioeconomic indicators show that

M

ā

ori still fare worse than non-M

ā

ori. Life expectancy is

some eight years less; acute and chronic illnesses are two

to three times more frequent; educational achievement is

significantly lower as are incomes, home ownership and

stable employment. M

ā

ori rates of imprisonment are higher

than for non-M

ā

ori, truancy rates are similarly greater and

poverty among M

ā

ori families is substantially higher than

among other sections of society. According to the 2013 Child

Poverty Monitor, one in three M

ā

ori children is deemed to

live in poverty compared to one in seven European children.

In some areas the disparities have increased despite the

increasing number of M

ā

ori non-governmental organiza-

tions (NGOs) delivering a wide range of services, mainly in

health and social services. But the services have generally

been small, in competition with each other, and geared

to the resolution of individual crises. Contractual obliga-

tions required by government funders have been narrowly

defined, favouring specific interventions such as truancy,

diabetes management or smoking cessation, and meas-

urements of compliance have focused on accounting for

volumes rather than results. What had been missing was

an approach that could incorporate individually-oriented

Wh

ā

nau Ora combines social, cultural and economic values to provide

integrated services that contribute to wh

ā

nau empowerment

Image: Rosalie Liddle Crawford