Previous Page  145 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 145 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 145

• Third generation regional climate model (HadRM3) derived

projected climate scenarios

• Hydrological modelling using SWAT including irrigation water,

and agricultural crop modelling using EPIC modelling.

The modelling framework used in this study established iden-

tified links between these components. These included

databases and models that were designed to facilitate water

resources and crop modelling under climate variability and

climate change scenarios. The baseline and future climate

scenarios from HadRM3 were used as inputs to both hydrolog-

ical and crop simulation models.

A range of emission scenarios was developed in the

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special

Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES). These reflected a wide

range of the main demographic, technological and economic

driving forces of future emissions. The future climate was

projected for the years 2071 through 2100 for IPCC SRES A2

and B2 scenarios (A2 and B2 represent high- and low-level emis-

sion scenarios respectively for the region in which India lies).

Results for the Pennar region revealed that the mean annual

flows in the river system would increase by 8 per cent in A2 and

4 per cent in B2, whereas the increases in evapotranspiration losses

were found to be about 10 per cent in A2 and 12 per cent in B2.

Three rain-fed crops (groundnut, jowar, sunflower) showed

decreased yields under A2, whereas in B2 they seemed to fare

relatively better. The decrease was significant for groundnut: 38

per cent for A2 and 20 per cent for B2. Rice, being an irrigated

crop, showed a decrease in yield by 15 per cent and 7 per cent

for A2 and B2 scenarios respectively. The decrease in yields was

mainly due to further increases in temperature under climate

change scenarios, as has also been observed in experiments.

The modelling framework developed by RMSI is biophysical

in nature and can adequately predict the observed and current

cropping mix. This framework can be ported to other areas with

or without modifications.

Conclusion

Geospatial technologies are indispensable tools to manage

natural disasters, as evidenced by the case studies above. An

innovative combination of information technologies in general,

and geospatial technologies in particular, with science and engi-

neering, makes the best decision support systems for managing

disasters.

Source: RMSI

Percentage deviation from baseline groundnut yields

Graphical User Interface

INPUT

MODELLING

OUTPUT

EPIC

INPUT

MODELLING

OUTPUT

SWAT

DATABASE

Derived surface water for

irrigated agriculture

Front end procedures

Back end procedures

The system architecture of the IMS

Source: RMSI