Previous Page  146 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 146 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 146

A

S SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY

evolves, and imagery resolution

becomes higher, there is increasingly open discussion on

the potential of existing and foreseeable tools in all sorts

of scientific and social areas. Though still unaffordable in several

developing contexts, satellite technology is rapidly becoming part

of the daily (working) life of millions of people. Personal naviga-

tion systems and, more recently yet, desktop earth observation

applications like Google Earth are exposing millions of users to

the amazing world of remote sensing from space.

As a reflection of this evolution, global programmes are taking

shape, which will change the current perception of space appli-

cations as purely scientific, and instead help bring space down

to earth. Ventures such as the European Space Agency’s (ESA)

Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES), and

the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS), are

evidence of space wanting to move into diverse societal benefit

areas. Meanwhile the United Nations has been following and in

some cases spearheading reflection on the potential of space

applications through institutions such as the UN Committee

for the Peaceful Use of Outer Space (COPUOS) and

programmes like UNOSAT, the Operational Satellite

Applications Programme of the United Nations Institute for

Training and Research (UNITAR). Other examples exist, such as

UNEP, FAO, WFP, WMO, and WHO. Through these capacities,

the UN is striving to take a balanced approach to the use of

space and satellite applications in the multiple areas in which

it holds a mandate, not forgetting that this matter relates as

well to information and communications technology (ICT)

development and ICT for development. UNITAR is one example

of a UN initiative looking at both satellite technology and ICT

from the angle of their applications towards concrete benefits

for societies and individuals.

For a sector like space that has strong scientific and engineer-

ing components, it is not easy to think in terms of beneficiaries

at the local level. But for the UN this is an imperative. That is

why the space sector and the UN have found several ways to

collaborate and each provide their own contribution to the

advancement of these applications while targeting specific groups

of users, from humanitarian relief to emergency response, to local

capacity building and environment protection.

UNOSAT suggests an approach entirely aimed at understanding

user needs and identifying the appropriate applications while devel-

oping local capacity in the medium- to long-term. It has done so

in post-crisis reconstruction, but also in disaster reduction. The

latter is one area where not only is the task before nations enor-

mous; it is also one where talking about technology alone will not

suffice to save the lives of those in danger. To achieve that requires

usable, affordable and appropriate applications.

Earth observation data and geographic information systems

(GIS) have proven to be useful tools for effective decision-making.

For developing countries in particular, with relatively poor terri-

torial documentation and often outdated maps, routinely acquired

satellite imagery combined with local field surveys can be used

in a variety of tasks. Local institutions, for example, can run analy-

ses on the geophysical risks facing their communities, and then

develop plans for improved urban and rural territorial manage-

ment and time-stamp the environmental situation at certain

intervals to monitor environmental parameters, such as forest

cover and urban expansion.

Part of this work includes the collection of data from earth

observation satellites and also local global positioning system

(GPS) recordings, its storage in a GIS, its analysis, and finally

mapping and integration in a holistic city and regional plan.

Elements of such a plan include risk assessments of landslides,

floods etc. and an estimate of overall vulnerability.

Risk analyses are carried out by combining geophysical and

geological parameters (such as land-cover type, elevation, slope,

hydrographic network) with socio-economic parameters (for

example, population distribution and density, income, and asset

values.). All this information can be allocated to a geographical

distribution, hence applicable to a GIS. As the risk assessment

surveys are directly applicable to the people living in the specific

area, a community-based approach using detailed local knowl-

edge about the territory in combination with GIS has proven a

winning combination.

Risk assessment can be aimed at specific types of natural hazards

in order to prepare emergency scenarios and improve resilience

through adequate city planning. A practical example of this is the

action taken by the community of Matagalpa in Nicaragua, to move

the location of one of its schools from grounds at high risk from

landslides to a new low-risk location. This alone reduced the vulner-

ability of an important population layer of the community. Another

example is the recent, more restrictive policy applied by the same

community to licences for building along the riverbanks. This zone

is clearly very exposed to floods, but now the local GIS can quan-

tify and illustrate the actual areas at risk.

The success of using satellite remote sensing and GIS in

Matagalpa was possibly thanks to the work of UNOSAT and its

Moving from technology to its applications:

using satellite remote sensing for disaster

prevention and vulnerability reduction

F. Pisano and E. Bjorgo, UNITAR Operational Satellite Applications Programme