Previous Page  61 / 85 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 61 / 85 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 61

Indeed, we are in a happy situation, because one of the

two companies that can guarantee this technique is

located in Austria.

Next, we explained our planning to all ministries and

large industries, requesting specific additions to the

health plan. The target was to secure public life and

security throughout the country, in the event of a flu

pandemic.

It is clear that all levels of society – public bodies,

private industry, and families – need to work together

to create an effective shield that will protect the popu-

lation. In a nationwide effort, we offered a common

purchasing of antivirals, and this was accepted by a

large part of the industry. In cooperation with our

defence ministry, we would be able to stockpile phar-

maceuticals and facemasks. Of course, efforts towards

such preparedness can never stop, and a constant

updating of all planning is necessary.

Preparedness across Europe

These issues and measures should extend beyond a

single country. A key requirement in preparing for future

pandemics is the coordination and synchronization of

preparedness measures Europe-wide. This was one of

the lessons learned under the first EU-wide pandemic

exercise.

From lessons learned, especially in Southeast Asia, it was clear

that there was a strong connection between the spread of avian flu

and a decrease in Gross National Product (GNP). Under the guide-

line ‘health in all policies’, we started our work primarily in the

public health field. However, an accompanying crossover with essen-

tial services and trade was also announced. Strong cooperation

between public health organizations at federal and regional levels

resulted in the structuring of a federal guideline and regional real-

ization plans.

From the beginning, all three medical universities were involved.

A special scientific advisory board was created under the chair of the

Director General of public health. We began working first to final-

ize a theoretical plan, and then to establish budgeting for it.

At the start, one important question was raised: what part of the

population should be protected – all of it, or only a part? Following

discussions with our acting minister it was decided that we want to

support and protect a maximum of the population.

The second development was our decision to use antivirals and

prophylactics, especially for all essential services. This had been

acknowledged before, but had not been a practical option until

recently.

Third, we wanted to ensure we had the best vaccine – that is, the

most recently produced vaccine using the pandemic strain. However,

the existing egg-based production techniques meant that these could

not be produced in time. Now, though, the cell-culture based vaccine

production technique gives us the opportunity to reach this target.

Van Swieten

Van Swieten was the first Austrian national exercise to evaluate

crisis management of a national emergency due to an infectious

disease.

2

In general, the EU exercise ‘Common Ground’ was taken

as a model for the national exercise concerning scenario, aims

and objective. Additionally, the results of the evaluation of

Common Ground were incorporated. The exercise took place in

November 2006 and lasted for two days.

The aim of the exercise was to evaluate the communication and

cooperation between national and regional levels during a

pandemic situation. The exercise centre was located on national

level. All public health officers on regional level were actively

involved, while the involvement of the district level was voluntary.

Furthermore, several hospitals asked for participation to test there

internal crisis plans.

The objectives of the exercise were the evaluation of:

• Communication between the Ministry of Health (MoH), the nine

regional health boards and the other involved ministries

• General preparedness for an influenza pandemic in Austria

• The interoperability of the regional plans.

Central elements of the exercise were therefore:

• Surveillance during a pandemic

• Counter measures such as use of antiviral medicinal products

and the pandemic vaccine

• Logistic issues

• Trans-border issues such as ‘health shopping’ and travel

restrictions.

The scenario of this two-day exercise was divided into three blocks

and covered six months in real time. Each block was played in

compressed time. In block one, players had to react according to

pandemic phase 5 when clusters of human infections with a new

influenza virus subtype appeared in Southeast Asia. In block two,

players had to manage pandemic phase 6 with no availability of

pandemic vaccine. In block three, the logistics for the use of the

pandemic vaccine during the second pandemic wave (phase 6)

had to be handled.

Van Swieten was evaluated by the same methods as used in the

evaluation of Common Ground.

3

In the evaluation process the

need for intensive work on several topics was disclosed:

• Continuous inter-ministerial cooperation concerning the issue

border control/closure of borders, closure of airports and ‘health

shopping’

• Concrete plans for business continuity

• Planning presumptions (definition of triggers for certain

situations).

However, one of the most important results was the need for

strengthening the public health sector. A well functioning public

health system is the backbone for successful crisis management

in the field of infectious diseases, and thus needs to be

supported concerning human and financial resources.

Furthermore, public health officers need to have continuous

access to training on high level. Therefore in 2006, the Austrian

MoH started a special initiative to send key personnel of the

regional health boards to international training seminars and

workshops.

4

A group of well-trained public health experts will be

established that can function as multipliers at regional level.

Additionally, the MoH organizes crisis management training

seminars at national level.

Another important element is the electronic reporting system for

infectious diseases (EMS), which was implemented in Austria

beginning in 2009.

5

The EMS allows for real-time surveillance and

thus for immediate crisis management when needed. The EMS will

be fully integrated in future exercises in order to optimize its

functionality.