Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  62 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 62 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 60

included in the mission were assisted in forming Village

Development Committees (VDCs), which were the link between the

implementing agency and the beneficiaries. Recipients of shelter

were identified through consensus in committee meetings that were

attended by all residents of a village.

The houses were specially modelled to comply with the socio-

cultural and environmental peculiarities of the district and the villages

involved. The houses are built in a circular fashion on a foundation

of 3.5 feet, and made of earthen blocks. The model was on the same

lines as traditional Dhanis. The circular model is well adapted to the

weather. The shape of the structure keeps the high-speed sandy winds

from thrusting against the house, which could be a concern in a model

that consists of corners and points of obstruction for the sweep of

wind. Strengthening the structure further is the use of earthen blocks

as opposed to the normal practice of bricks and cement. These earth-

quake-resistant interlocking blocks are made of the regular dose of

cement, sand and an added ingredient of sand-loam soil, which is

sticky in texture and has a cooling effect.

Completing the construction of the house was left to the benefi-

ciaries and their families. This involved roofing the house, which

only required the families’ effort, time and a little money. The money

is needed to pay the carpenter who does the woodwork, which forms

the base to lay the three layers of the roof. Material for the roofing

is easily available locally, and is known as ‘Shaniya’ or ‘Kheep’. The

final step is the roping of the roof once all the layers are in place.

Ropes are made by the villagers themselves using straw. The conically

shaped roof converges at the top to form a thick stump (known as

‘Chotti’) bound tightly with ropes, which diverts rain-

water from seeping into the house.

Traditionally, communities in desert areas have evolved

rounded housing units. To a contemporary architect, this

may not be the best example of the internal organization

of space. However, the design works wonderfully well

from several environmental perspectives. The rounded

design of housing units in Kutch (Bhungas) evolved

because communities found this to be a perfect example

of seismically sound design. In the Thar desert areas of

Barmer district in Rajasthan, rounded units facilitated

wind movement, thus preventing severe desert storms

from hitting barriers and dropping dust.

Current practices are promoting regular stone

masonry with galvanized iron roofs. Rather than adapt-

ing traditional means to modern needs, these practices

set new paradigms, the impacts of which are not known.

These practices may provide improved utilization of

internal space. However, they cause increased insolation

within houses, do not facilitate wind movements and as

a result add up to increased environmental stress for

communities. Over a period of time, such communities

become more vulnerable.

Sudden shocks such as the August 2006 floods cause

havoc. At the first level, traditional practices collapse; at the

second level the new paradigms that are in vogue and have

perpetrated vulnerability increase the intensity of damage.

The traditional Dhanis of Barmer district were primarily made of a mixture of soil, cow dung and locally available wooden constituents

Image: SEEDS