Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  66 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 66 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 64

provides financial protection against drought conditions for up

to 400,000 people in Africa

• In Mexico, the state-owned reinsurance company Agroasemex

insured small cattle ranchers against droughts and other

climatic events that would reduce the animal feedstock on their

pasture. Swiss Re supported the transaction as an international

reinsurer

• In Canada, Swiss Re insured the state of Alberta against wildfire.

The insurance scheme helps the Forest Protection Division of

Alberta finance the cost of fighting wildfire and restoring

damaged forest.

Developing countries affected most

The effective reduction and financing of catastrophic risks requires

a combined response by both private and public sector players. As

complexity and costs rise, single organizations can no longer meet

the challenge alone. This is particularly true for developing coun-

tries, which, besides having fewer funds, also bear the brunt of global

warming. Public-private partnerships can help governments absorb

catastrophes – and thus also provide individuals and businesses with

greater financial security.

As a first step, governments and the private sector must work

together to raise awareness of risks and their possible solutions

through risk transfer schemes. This is critical as many perils have

rather low probabilities – i.e. long return periods – and are thus

frequently ignored. Major earthquakes are an example. Risk aware-

ness also includes showing possible solutions for risk prevention, as

well as for risk transfer and financing.

Partnership in risk transfer and financing

For insurance to work effectively, governments must ensure a frame-

work that allows market mechanisms to work unhindered.

Government intervention in a functioning insurance market should be

limited, since it can trigger unexpected side effects such as moral

hazard and may lead to further interventions rather than addressing

the root causes. For example, public and semi-private

insurance schemes that keep rates artificially low may

encourage homeowners to stay in highly exposed areas,

thus further increasing the burden of natural disasters for

society and the public sector.

The public sector plays a key role in setting a legal

framework that enables risks to be transferred to insur-

ers, reinsurers and the capital markets. In addition to

passing the necessary legislation, it must provide insur-

ers with efficient access to its markets.

In some situations, governments and international

organizations can help to expand the availability of risk

transfer solutions for individuals and corporations. For

example, they can encourage or enforce the creation of

‘risk communities’ through compulsory insurance in

order to establish a critical mass and make an event

insurable.

Governments may also act as reinsurers in order to

supplement private insurance schemes. For example,

governments – and NGOs – can encourage the devel-

opment of an insurance market by initially subsidising

insurance premiums. However, the public sector should

limit its involvement in order to avoid establishing false

incentives. Instead, it should focus its intervention on

expanding the availability of insurance schemes – with

the ultimate aim of establishing an efficient private-sector

market.

Public-private risk transfer partnerships clearly have

an important role to play in managing the increasing

level of disaster expenses. They enable the public sector

to fund disaster relief before – instead of after – a cata-

strophe occurs. As a result, governments will be able to

deliver immediate relief to the victims of climate cata-

strophes without creating a significant sudden burden

for public finances.

As part of a ‘Vivamos Mejor’ project supported by Swiss Re, a community in the Atitlán region of Guatemala develops

risk mitigation measures against natural catastrophes

Image: Vivamos Mejor