Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  83 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 83 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 81

district, and briskly embedded some of the findings of

PADR; the laying out of evacuation routes, community

infrastructure and connectivity, for example. FFW inter-

vention addressed household food insecurity for a period

of three months, reinstated community infrastructure such

as roads and ponds, rebuilt damaged individual houses

with raised platforms and laid out evacuation routes as

designed by the community. Moreover, the involvement of

the community in the process worked as a safety valve to

ventilate the psycho-social trauma that arose out of flood

hazard, thereby restoring their sense of confidence.

The FFW intervention produced a conducive atmos-

phere for long-term intervention in community-based

disaster management, with a focus on risk reduction that

involves community preparedness, mitigation and

response. Considering resource availability and programme

feasibility options, 20 villages of the Andhrathari,

Madhepur and Khutona blocks of Madhubani district were

chosen as the operational area, with the support of DFID

through Tearfund UK and Tear Australia.

The following components of disaster risk reduction

(DRR) were nestled into the community mobilization

process.

A Disaster Risk Reduction Fund (DRRF), as enshrined

in the disaster management act 2005, was introduced

into the community discussion process as part of

preparedness measures against the floods. The commu-

nity, despite initial inhibitions, unanimously decided in

favour of it, and decided to contribute INR5-10 per

family per month, (the figure varies from village to

village). In a span of three months the DRRF was set up

in all the villages. As of March 2008 the total amount of

INR125,000 had been deposited. The fund came to the

aid of the community during the 2007 flood by propping

up its foodstuffs purchasing power during the emergency.

For instance, the people of Gandhrain and Bhadwar

villages in Andhrathari block managed to purchase food

grain that sustained them for about seven days during

the emergency. Relief assistance (both from government

Relief intervention in 2004 worked as a catalyst to build rapport with

flood-affected communities in Bihar, allowing EFICOR to think about

long-term intervention in terms of rehabilitation.

A planning tool process called Participatory Assessment of Disaster Risk

(PADR) was initiated in November 2004 to understand the community

perspective on disaster management, which enveloped hazard assessment,

risk associated with hazards, vulnerability assessment and community

coping capacity. The PADR process gave EFICOR a chance to replicate

the lessons gleaned through the Disaster Mitigation and Preparedness

Program (DMPP) implemented in the flood affected Khammam district

of Andhra Pradesh, with the support of Tearfund UK in 2003.

Subsequently, a food for work (FFW) programme ensued for a period

of three months with the support of the Canadian Food Grain Bank

(CFGB). The programme was implemented in 20 villages of Madhubani

Policy influencing

and ensuring

governance

Disaster Risk

Reduction to build

a resilient

community

Diversification

of livelihood in

primary sector

Community

capacity

building Disaster

Management

Committee

& Taskforce

Disaster Risk

Reduction Fund

Preparedness

measures and

mitigation

structures

The community mobilization process includes several

components of DRR

Source: EFICOR, DRR Project, Madhubani, Bihar

A high raised tube well which provides safe drinking water

Image: EFICOR, DRR Project, Madhubani, Bihar

A farmer carries sugar cane (an early crop) bundle

Image: EFICOR, DRR Project, Madhubani, Bihar