Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  167 / 210 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 167 / 210 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 165

E

nsuring

W

ork

-F

amily

B

alance

enriching environment, 31 per cent in a favourable environ-

ment). The remaining 54 per cent work in environments that

are difficult and hostile towards family and integration (41

per cent in an unfavourable environment and 13 per cent in a

polluted environment).

The results around the world confirm that people who have

their supervisor’s support, access to conciliatory policies and

an environment culture that is favourable to CFR have:

• fewer intentions to leave the company – only 5 per cent

of those in an enriching environment claim to intend

leaving their current organization, compared with 50 per

cent of those in a polluted environment

• higher satisfaction with work-family balance – 16 per cent

of people in a polluted environment claim to be satisfied

with the way they integrate work and family, while 60

per cent of those working in enriching environments are

satisfied with their conciliation

• more productivity – in an enriching environment people

are 19 per cent more productive than those who work in

polluted environments

• higher perception of company support – 88 per cent

of workers in enriching environments perceive that the

company supports them, compared with 26 per cent

of people in environments that are difficult for them to

reconcile

• better health – 78 per cent of respondents express general

good health when in an enriching environment, compared

with 55 per cent of those in a polluted environment:

– when employees have to take care of young children

and their environment is enriching, their health is 40

per cent better than that of those who take care of their

children and are in a polluted environments

– employees who care for dependent parents and work in

environments that allow them to reconcile say they enjoy

excellent health; 71 per cent more than those in the same

circumstances who work in polluted environments

• more dedication to their young children – on a weekly

basis, people in enriching environments dedicate 21 per

cent more time to having dinner with their children, 32

per cent more time to playing with them and 37 per cent

more time to reading together, than those in polluted

working environments

• better quality of life – 83 per cent of people in polluted

environments consider themselves to have poor quality

of life, while 54 per cent of people whose environment is

enriching perceive a high quality of life.

In general terms, the results by continent show the same trend as

those mentioned above. It is worth highlighting that in Africa,

1

73 per cent of the people who work in enriching environments

appear to have a high level of quality of life, compared with

23 per cent of those in environments that make conciliation

difficult. In Asia,

2

none of the people working in an enriching

environment intend to leave the company, compared with 45

per cent of the people in polluted environments. In Europe,

3

3

per cent of people in polluted environments perceive support

from the company, compared to 87 per cent of those in an envi-

ronment that allows them to reconcile. Latin America

4

provided

several interesting results. In Ecuador, 16 per cent of those who

work in polluted environments have a higher intention to leave

IESE meets with companies to talk about CFR. From left, Nuria Chinchilla, IESE Professor; Antonio Gonzalez-Barros, founder and CEO of Intercom; Enrique Valer,

CEO of Schneider Electric Spain and Latin America; Joaquin Borrás, CEO of ISS Facility Management in Spain; and Vicente Ruiz, founder and CEO of RNB Cosmetics

Image: ICWF