[
] 179
S
ustainability
P
olicies
, P
rogrammes
and
their
E
conomic
I
mpact
The second transformation requires that production systems
become more efficient (that they produce more while consuming less)
and that the impact of the man-made infrastructure that is needed to
realize their market values is minimized, mitigated or compensated.
Production systems and infrastructure should be well planned follow-
ing the best benchmarks available and constrained by the protected
area network that protects the region’s critical natural capital.
For the third transformation, markets for ecosystem services must
be created or expanded following a sustainable path, and incentives
adopted to correct potential market failures. The values of the neces-
sary ecosystem services to a specific product have generally not been
incorporated in the prices, as they are perceived to be free of charge.
Initiatives such as payment for ecosystem services for freshwater and
carbon, as well as green taxes, are the first steps towards the recogni-
tion of monetary values for nature’s services by national societies.
The fourth transformation requires the progressive reduction – and
eventually the complete elimination – of the aggregate consumption
of products that are not produced following the best sustainability
standards available. The power of consumers is immense and has not
been adequately used to promote transformational changes to how
the markets operate. In a country whose government is an important
consumer, legislation supporting only the purchase of sustainable prod-
ucts by governmental organizations can quickly promote the incentives
that sustainable products need to become competitive in the market.
For the fifth transformation, financial resources coming from indi-
viduals, corporations and government must be directed mostly at
sustainable economic activities. Developed countries should make
sure that overseas development aid is used to maintain critical
natural capital and support the emergence of sustainable
economic activities, rather than to support the traditional
development models that have failed everywhere. The
private sector should incorporate social and environ-
mental safeguards in its investments above and beyond
the requirements of national legislation. Global stand-
ards built by different stakeholders working together
will certainly put some constraints on how investment
flows circulate around the world and which activities
they support.
The sixth transformation is one that assumes that HSEs
require a positive societal relationship with nature’s values
and effective governance of ecosystem services. As a conse-
quence, societies need to develop new and innovative
social agreements that define how ecosystem services will
be valued and managed. To be effective, these agreements
should define in simple terms:
• How the values of ecosystem services will be
incorporated in national accounts
• Who will own or have the rights to use ecosystem
services
• The process and tools that will be used by societies
to make decisions on the management of ecosystem
services.
All this must be done while taking into consideration
the interests of all stakeholders, particularly the most
vulnerable sectors of society.
Cajas Park, southern Ecuador, 2007. Healthy, sustainable economies depend on natural ecosystems
Image: ©Robin Moore/iLCP




