Previous Page  56 / 208 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 56

P

eople

:

social

inclusion

,

green

jobs

,

education

The history of sustainable development is marked not

only by the successive emergence of different concepts

integrating the previous ones (environment, sustainable

development, social responsibility and green economy)

but also by the influence of stakeholders who contribute

to these concepts.

The relationships between these networks of influ-

ence and governments negotiating in the multilateral

system are essential to global governance for sustain-

able development. Agenda 21 devoted its third part to

‘Strengthening the Role of Major Groups,’ acknowledg-

ing that nine sectors of civil society have a key role

in sustainable development and are granted consulta-

tive status. These include women, children, the young,

indigenous peoples, non-governmental organizations

(NGOs), local authorities, employees and unions, busi-

ness, scientific and technical communities and farmers.

The influence of these actors has varied over time in

parallel with the issues they face. Social responsibility,

in particular the green economy, provides an important

role for business.

It is within this international context that the

International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

published ISO 26000:2010(E) to update its 2005 guid-

ance document for social responsibility, ISO26000. ISO

is a network of the national standards institutes of 163

countries. Traditionally dominated by business, it has

implemented a new process for the development of ISO

26000, which involves 450 participating experts, 210

observers from 99 ISO member countries and 42 liaison

organizations. Each ISO member country was invited

to nominate experts from six main stakeholder groups,

including industry, government, labour, consumers,

a company identifies and engages with its stakeholders. Based on this

logic, public goods are produced through the free interaction of moral

actors, who are engaged in ethical behaviour.

The second is the more recent institutional approach. It is down-

ward-oriented as incorporates awareness of the limits of governance

– including international governance – and of regulation within

environmental and social domains. Companies are asked to volun-

tarily commit themselves to achieving compliance over and above

regulatory requirements. Public goals are defined and implemented

within the framework of public institutions.

The emergence of CSR in international institutions began five

years after the United Nations Conference on Environment and

Development (UNCED) in 1992. The conclusions of UNCED

focused on public policies and the commitment of developed coun-

tries to devote 0.7 per cent of Gross National Product (GNP) to

development aid, in exchange for environmental commitments

from developing countries. But the early 1990s marked the begin-

ning of globalization and an understanding that private investment

has a greater impact on development than Official Development

Assistance and that across the 100 largest economies, there were

50 countries counting their GNP and 50 multinationals counting

their turnover.

Therefore, in 1997 the Global Reporting Initiative, driven by the

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), businesses and

NGOs, developed a reporting framework, guidelines and indicators

for companies. Two years later, launched by then United Nations

Secretary-General Kofi Annan at the Davos World Economic Forum

in January 1999, the United Nations Global Compact encouraged

participating companies to respect nine principles in relation to

human rights, including freedom of association, working conditions

and environmental protection. This was followed in 2005 by a tenth

principle on corruption and a requirement that participating nations

publish their improvements by area, once a year.

Architecture of governance in sustainable development

Source:

©brodhag.org