Previous Page  54 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

measures. The underlying objective for risk handling is to plan

and implement protective measures. The main criterion for

choosing protective measures is cost-effectiveness. To efficiently

put this ambitious concept across, a common basis of under-

standing is needed, consisting of the following:

• A risk-oriented approach and methodology for dealing with

uncertainties, applying to both the analysis and the evalu-

ation of risk

• The limits of safety efforts versus the expectations of civil

society

• The various points of view, attitudes, and values of all stake-

holders involved and affected by the risk

• Disaster risk prevention and mitigation measures must take

the whole set of pre- and post-disaster measures into

consideration, as well as measures during the event itself

or risk transfer by insurance

• The need for dialogue and communication, not only in

conveying bald facts and conducting dialogue, but also to

ensure the participation of all stakeholders, when setting limits

for protection and defining the processes of decision-making.

Risk communication can have a major impact on a society’s

level of preparation and reaction to crises and disasters

• All solutions must fulfil the criteria of sustainability, i.e. a

sustainable means of disaster risk management has to be a

socially, economically, and environmentally balanced

approach.

Integral risk management also needs a strategic and systematic

control process, including periodic evaluation of the risk situ-

ation and a comprehensive risk dialogue between all

stakeholders.

The risk concept

In order to compare different types of natural hazards and their

related risks and to design adequate risk reduction measures, a

consistent and systematic approach has to be established, from

here on called the ‘risk concept.’ This represents the method-

ological base for an integral risk management and for the

decision-making process of risk reduction and mitigation

measures, and serves as a transparent base for risk dialogue

between all stakeholders. The basic principles of the risk

concept can be summarized by the following key questions:

• How safe is safe enough?

• What can happen?

• What is acceptable (to happen)?

• What needs to be done?

The question: ‘What can happen?’ has to be answered by a risk

analysis procedure, while the question: ‘What is acceptable?’

Is answered through risk assessment. The goal of a risk analy-

sis is the most objective identification of the risk factors for a

specific damage event, object or area. In answering the ques-

tion of what can happen, a variety of influencing factors need

to be considered.

Risk assessment aims for an explicitly subjective answer to

the question: ‘What is acceptable (to happen)?’ by asking how

big a residual risk can be handled. Risk assessment is by nature

very complex, and has to deal with the fact that risk is a mental

construct. One important aspect is risk aversion towards events

with great extent. The total effects of a large event rise dispro-

portionately, as does the wish to prevent it.

Acceptance of a risk also depends on whether or not it is taken

by choice. Risk categories are defined to the extent of self-

reliance being deployed. The assessment is closely coupled with

protection goals, a set of criteria for the implementation of the

primary goals of all efforts to improve security as they are being

used for operational risk assessment – especially if the ques-

tion is how far the measures should go. The marginal costs of

safety measures, representing certain expenses per avoided fatal-

ity or per saved human life, have proven to be the most useful

protection goal.

3

Safety measures for the protection of people

can be increased until that level is reached. Determining the

marginal costs can lead to the misunderstanding that a price is

being allocated to a human life. But the criterion of marginal

costs makes it possible to save as many lives as possible within

the limitations of available means and resources.

[

] 54

Necessary steps for risk analysis, risk assessment and integral planning of measures