Previous Page  55 / 156 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 55 / 156 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 55

The planning of measures serves to identify and assess those

measures that are necessary and appropriate to reach the protec-

tion goals. The main function of integrated measures planning

is to achieve the intended level of safety for agreed limits in the

most cost-effective way. Organizational, technical and biologi-

cal protective measures must be planned, checked for

effectiveness and undertaken in concert, while keeping in mind

that prevention, intervention and reconstruction are all equally

valid risk management measures. Further criteria such as

sustainability, acceptability, feasibility and reliability of solu-

tions must also be kept in mind.

Safety measures always come along with ‘side effects,’ the

most obvious of which is the financial aspect. But aspects of

ecology, of landscape protection or of land use planning can be

of equal importance. The optimal coordination of all measures

has to consider all relevant aspects, and all activities in the field

of disaster risk reduction must obey the principles of sustain-

ability. Measures need to be environmentally sound, consider

societal preferences and be cost effective. Further, disaster risk

reduction must be part of the sustainable use of natural

resources and of sustainable development, and is therefore

considered a cross-cutting issue.

The socio-political aspects of sustainability are a question of

development and welfare priorities and have to be seen in

context with other targets such as education or healthcare.

Especially in developing countries, reallocation of resources is

often needed after major catastrophes for recovery purposes –

resources that were allocated originally for use in, for example,

investments in education, health care or welfare. A political

balance between long-term investments for prevention and

short-term measures for intervention and recovery is therefore

needed.

Risk dialogue and strategic control

Integral risk management not only dictates that measures are

planned, assessed and applied in accordance with the risk

concept, but also that all those who are involved and affected

are included via a comprehensive risk dialogue, in the process

of planning protection measures. Risk communication and risk

dialogue with all stakeholders and the public have to start very

early. They will be dominated at the beginning more by ques-

tions than answers, and by processes rather than solutions. A

continuous, comprehensive risk dialogue is therefore of vital

importance, thus transforming risk management to become

transparent, understandable and a matter of public trust. Active

information and communication plays a dominant role in crisis

situations – a well-informed public will sustain a catastrophic

situation much better and the risk of panic and long-term

damage can be limited.

A strategic control process periodically checks the risk situa-

tion and the costs and benefits of measures, as well as

monitoring residual risks. Integral risk management shows,

through the basis of the risk concept, how the underlying aims

can be reached with corresponding technically, economically,

societal and environmentally justifiable protection measures.

Outlook

Numerous uncertainties can increase risk in the future. Among

the most important factors that have to be considered, monitored

and periodically checked are globalization, mobility, vulnerabil-

ity, the spread of populated areas and the increase in their value,

sensitivity (through increasing economic interdependencies),

international leisure activities, socio-political changes and chang-

ing climate and weather patterns. Developments in the hazard

and risk process flow must be followed carefully and the poten-

tial for optimization exploited. For the future, the challenge will

be constant change: new risk scenarios, new hazards, climate

change, new social-political conditions, etc. Strategies for dealing

with risks due to natural hazards will therefore have to be adapted

periodically.

The risk circle and possible measures for risk reduction and mitigation

Organizational measures

Emergency crisis management

Reconstruction

Recovery

Prevention

Intervention

Land-use planning measures

(Hazard maps)

Technical (engineering) measures

Biological measures

Insurance

Necessary steps for risk analysis, risk assessment and integral planning of measures

Risk Analysis

• Hazard analysis

– Event analysis

– Effect analysis

• Exposure analysis

• Impact analysis (vulnerability analysis/robustness)

• Risk estimation and risk description/visualisation

Risk Assessment

• Protection goals

– Life risk

- Individual risk

- Collective risk

– Assets/material damage

• Risk categories

• Risk aversion

Planning of Measures

• Risk-cost-relationship

• Marginal costs

• Integration of all possible measures

• Comprehensive assessment of all measures