Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  129 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 129 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 127

of risk-reduction planning in disaster-prone areas. Built

environment professionals can provide vital support in

bridging these gaps, as the example of Rob’s work in

Montserrat has shown.

The international organizations involved in disaster

relief are often geared toward providing immediate relief

and usually exit the situation once short-term relief has

been provided. On the other hand, with the Indian Ocean

tsunami there was enormous pressure to be visibly seen

to spend the huge amounts of public donations that were

made. However, NGOs acknowledged that they were not

reconstruction experts – a report commissioned by the

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent

Societies (IFRC), evaluating its response during the first

few weeks after the tsunami, ‘concluded that the organi-

zation had so much money that it entered areas – like

house-building on a massive scale – that were outside

its usual mandate and poorly handled’.

3

One of the few

good things to come out of disasters is the opportunity

to ‘build back better’, but that opportunity is too often

missed, or comes too late for the affected communities.

Discussions with the humanitarian relief commu-

nity and needs identified

The RICS Commission has built extensive links with

the humanitarian community, and has advised NGOs

and UN agencies, and the World Economic Forum on

guidelines for public-private partnerships; it has also

sourced professionals, on request, to advise on projects.

Meeting with those already involved in disaster relief

and recovery has been crucial to the MDMC’s approach

in seeking ways to bridge the gap. From the discussions

with the humanitarian relief community (such as UN

organizations, NGOs, professional bodies, the World

Bank, the World Economic Forum) the following were

key issues raised:

humanitarian relief after a disaster and the long-term reconstruction

process. The reasons for the gap include institutional constraints,

gaps in communication, lack of access to appropriate use of profes-

sional skills and knowledge to support the local effort, and failures

in management and planning. It was also found that the funding of

recovery from disasters is inflexible and short term-focused, which

made it difficult to plan and create a smooth and rapid transition to

long-term reconstruction.

The report identified that long-term reconstruction is ‘constrained

by the lack of planning, coordinated management and targeted funding

of the response in the post-disaster recovery phase.’

2

Significant short-

falls in knowledge, skills and capacity exist, which cause delays in the

reconstruction of communities post-disaster, and restrict the efficiency

A transitonal camp in the Lampu-uk area, Sub District Lhok Nga,

Aceh Besar District, Aceh

Image: M Rizal

50 houses for old people were built at Lookout, a new village created after the

volcano. The project was split into seven packages to assist local builders

Image: Rob Worthington

The old people’s houses and community centre

Image: Rob Worthington