Previous Page  117 / 208 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 117 / 208 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 117

S

ustainable

agriculture

,

wildlife

,

food

security

,

consumption

and

production

patterns

to equitably serve the local population. Stefan Buzarovski from

Oxford, UK, is one of the leading experts in South-Eastern Europe

on local environmental action planning. He believes that develop-

ing LSDPDs is in line with the idea of reconciling environmental

protection and social justice with economic development. Thus,

local communities simply need to make peace between the envi-

ronment, their social goals (or aspirations) and economic growth.

Some, who we will dare to be called optimists, will nod their

heads, roll up their sleeves and get to work. The Government of

Serbia sees itself as a member of this camp. The Serbian Government

decided after the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development

(WSSD) to initiate the development of the National Sustainable

Development Strategy (NSDS), which was adopted in 2008. The

NSDS was built on a number of broad working groups. One of these

dealt with the institutional framework for NSDS implementation,

thus deliberating on local-level actions for sustainability.

The Government has been assisting local administrations in

enhancing their capacities to manage their environment and, ulti-

mately, to embark on a path towards sustainable development. Apart

from being keen to teach people how to fish instead of

giving them fish, the NSDS follows the idea that local

governance is the closest to the people, and that it plays

a vital role in educating, mobilizing and responding to

the public to promote sustainable development. The

Government has done this by working on local develop-

ment or, more concretely, assisting local communities

to develop LSDPDs. In addition to working towards

sustainability, LSDPDs also work towards decentrali-

zation. To accomplish this, local governments need

to have a certain security in their existence, sufficient

resources and autonomy. LSDPDs aim to help authori-

ties make their actions more credible and transparent,

and to cultivate equitable relationships with higher

authorities.

Good catch or red herring?

LSDPDs seem to be a good catch in Serbia. They

incorporate public participation in environmen-

tal decision-making, take local circumstances into

account and provide a planning framework for poten-

tial investments. But even though they do all these

things, do they actually promote the larger aim of

sustainable development? In other words, are LSDPDs

just a red herring?

‘Traditional’ environmental planning methods,

including those for public participation, provide an

information base to support stakeholder decision-

making. But these methods often prove inadequate for

the long-term task of sustainable development plan-

ning. LSDPDs go a step further toward incorporating

the development agenda of societies and, therefore, of

local communities into the planning process. Other

methods and tools based on the traditional concepts

of environmental planning have also been redefined

and adapted in LSDPDs. This is especially true in the

areas of creating a common picture of current develop-

ment conditions and assessing systemic problems and

requirements.

A good example of how LSDPDs can improve the

overall planning process is Serbia – a country where

almost 25 per cent of municipalities have devel-

oped LSDPDs. The Serbian Ministry of Environment,

Mining and Spatial Planning and other institutions

started working towards introducing new practices in

local planning in 2001. So LSDPDs cannot be so easily

dismissed as a red herring.

But can anything else be done to make local devel-

opment planned through LSDPDs in Serbia more

sustainable? Ensuring functional vertical integration

and revisiting methodologies for LSDPDs are some of

the items on the top of this list.

Ways forward

Serbia’s NSDS relies on the principles of inclusive-

ness of all interested parties in the process of bringing

about sustainable development; intensity of decision-

making for sustainable development; and integration

of not only three pillars of sustainable development,

Image: Pavle Pavlovic, Serbia