[
] 122
nation required for comprehensive DM. In order for
information to effectively support DM and DRR activi-
ties, those who need to use it must be able to do so.
While ICTs can help make marginalized groups more
visible to decision makers, if Internet penetration or
capacity is low, then they will not be effective in the
collection or wide dissemination of risk information.
These technologies also require specialized skill sets.
The use of ICTs to collect, analyse, integrate and share
risk information must not increase differential access
to information or representation in decision outputs
but should instead facilitate individual and collective
action to reduce disaster risk. Training and education
can help, but will not eliminate inequities.
Responding to the challenge
PDC is actively working to overcome these chal-
lenges and put relevant, understandable, actionable
information into the hands of those who need it.
The organization works with stakeholders around
the world to help them frame their data collection
efforts, identify intended outcomes and uses, outline
data and implementation requirements and gaps,
and develop strategies and solutions to help them
fill those gaps. PDC works with other information
providers and stakeholders to help establish common
information sharing policies that will help reduce
replication of effort and cost, and more effectively
support inter-agency and cross-boundary DRR and
DM activities. It provides training on data collection,
management, analysis methods and tools, in addition
to training on integrating spatial data into decision
making processes.
As an organization that uses ICT to enhance the
accessibility of risk information for decision makers,
disaster managers and the public, PDC was among
the first to make its early warning, hazard exposure
and other information products available via the Web
and Internet-based mapping applications. It publishes
the same information via social networks such as
Facebook and Twitter and is now taking advantage
of smart phones and similar devices to provide early
warning content on interactive maps through free
downloadable apps for Android and iPhones/iPads.
Other solutions provided by PDC include early
warning and decision support platforms with addi-
tional functionality and protection that can be used to
support a variety of mitigation, preparedness, response
and recovery activities. The platforms are integrated
with various modelling applications, and equipped with
state-of-the-art visualization tools. These platforms also
include tools that facilitate information sharing across
agencies and boundaries.
PDC is committed to promoting DRR through
enhancement of evidence-based decision making
capabilities. It provides support for DRR by helping
disaster managers, policy makers and the public
access and understand the information they need,
when they need it.
other DRR and DM activities. The project is already being used
to identify and share patterns of local security risks.
Data compilation, integration and sharing: making the visible
accessible
Those analysing and using information for DRR or DM decision
making are unlikely to be involved in direct data collection or
processing. Most risk-related information they use will have
already been collected and processed, but it is not often found
in one place. Hydrometeorological departments probably have
information on storms and flooding, but may not have data on
earthquakes. Information on population and socio-economic
characteristics, land use/land cover data and critical infrastruc-
ture data will likely all be housed within different agencies. As
a result, secondary data collection and integration can become
very time- and labour-intensive, decreasing visibility and delay-
ing decisions.
One of the advantages of digital information is that it is much
easier to bring it together in one place. Web-enabled database
and GIS applications are increasingly being used to integrate,
compile and disseminate disaster risk information. Global data
portals and online data warehouses such the PDC Global Hazards
Information Network, CRED/EM-DAT, CIESEN Columbia
University World Data Center, the Prevention Web Global Risk
Data Platform and the World Bank Indicators site make informa-
tion more readily available.
In addition to expanding access, web-based applications add value
and support both awareness and decision making. Social media
approaches have been described above. Tools such as the Global
Risk Data Platform
10
make the results of complex analyses available
in a form that is easy to understand and explore. Similarly, PDC’s
Global Hazards Atlas
11
allows users to interact with information
such as historical events, hazard layers and population data. The
Atlas also visualizes dynamic data such as active hazards, forecasts
and observational data, enabling users to monitor current condi-
tions within a broader situational context. These data are in turn
made available via spatial information sharing protocols, such as
WMS and WFS.
The configuration of these tools and representation of data layers
can be used to highlight key findings or relationships. Web-based
applications also allow users to interact with information that is
important to them without needing to be experts in either subject
matter or technology. Because of this, however, particular care must
be taken in the representation and documentation of information.
Data considerations
Data availability, quality and consistency are some of the biggest
challenges to accessing relevant information and making the invis-
ible visible in the decision making process. It is not uncommon for
monitoring networks and historical records to be sparse, or wholly
unavailable for certain phenomena. Primary collection of qualitative
and quantitative social and environmental data is expensive in terms
of both labour and capital. While analyses and decisions are only
as good as the data that goes into them, collection efforts must be
balanced with priorities, purpose, and internal and external human,
technical and financial resources.
Data sharing helps reduce the burden, but there are challenges
here as well. Institutional and technical structures do not always
support the free exchange of information. This affects the coordi-




